International Criminal Court asked to hear case that Covid is Bioweapon, Genetic Vaccines are Genocide

- Peter Myers

Date: September 25, 2021

My comments are shown {thus}; write to me at contact.html.

You are at http://mailstar.net/ICC-bioweapon-GoF.html

Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.

LATEST: Boyle-Covid-prosecute.html - Dr. Francis Boyle calls for Fauci et. al. to be prosecuted for the Covid Pandemic and Vaccines. Dr Francis Boyle is author of the Bioweapons Act. He does not mention the ICC, but that Court is the logical place for such a case to be brought. (21 09 25)

(1) EcoHealth Alliance planned to infect wild Chinese Bats With Covid, Leaked Docs Allege
(2) Proposal would create chimeric viruses to infect human beings via "human-specific cleavage sites"
(3) EcoHealth Alliance & Wuhan Institute of Virology colluded to carry out Gain of Gunction research - DRASTIC
(4) One of the resulting viruses was more pathogenic than the starting virus. NIH thus funded GoF - Richard Ebright
(5) International Criminal Court asked to hear case that Covid is Bioweapon, Genetic Vaccines are Genocide
(6) ICC case alleges World Governments Are Complicit in Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity
(7) Luc Montagnier blamed vaccines for triggering the creation of COVID-19 variants
(8) Joseph Mercola reviews 'Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?' by Dr. Richard Fleming
(9) "We Made Sars. And We Patented It On 19/4/2002, before there was any alleged outbreak in Asia"
(10) Peter Daszak acknowledged that the manipulation of the viris was done not by himself, but by "my colleagues in China"
(11) Chinese whistleblower alleges Chinese gov't spread COVID-19 at Wuhan Military Games, October 2019
(12) Fauci lied to Congress when he claimed he never funded Gain-of-Function research; punishable by five years in prison
(13) Elizabeth Warren & Adam Schiff demand Amazon ban Mercola book on Covid-19

(1) EcoHealth Alliance planned to infect wild Chinese Bats With Covid, Leaked Docs Allege

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/21/wuhan-scientists-planned-releaseskin-penetrating-nanoparticles/

Wuhan scientists planned to release coronavirus particles into cave bats, leaked papers reveal

Documents reveal researchers applied for $14m to fund controversial project in 2018

By Sarah Knapton, SCIENCE EDITOR

21 September 2021 o 5:48pm

Wuhan and US scientists were planning to release enhanced airborne coronavirus particles into Chinese bat populations to inoculate them against diseases that could jump to humans, leaked grant proposals dating from 2018 show.

New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles and aerosols containing "novel chimeric spike proteins" of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China.

They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) to fund the work.

Papers, confirmed as genuine by a former member of the Trump administration, show they were hoping to introduce "human-specific cleavage sites" to bat coronaviruses which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells.

When Covid-19 was first genetically sequenced, scientists were puzzled about how the virus had evolved such a human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site on the spike protein, which is the reason it is so infectious.

The documents were released by Drastic, the web-based investigations team set up by scientists from across the world to look into the origins of Covid-19.

In a statement, Drastic said: "Given that we find in this proposal a discussion of the planned introduction of human-specific cleavage sites, a review by the wider scientific community of the plausibility of artificial insertion is warranted."

The proposal also included plans to mix high-risk natural coronavirus strains with more infectious but less dangerous varieties.

The bid was submitted by British zoologist Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, the US-based organisation, which has worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researching bat coronaviruses.

Team members included Dr Shi Zhengli, the WIV researcher dubbed "bat woman", pictured below, as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina and the United States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Centre.

Darpa refused to fund the work, saying: "It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk", and warned that the team had not properly considered the dangers of enhancing the virus (gain of function research) or releasing a vaccine by air.

Grant documents show that the team also had some concerns about the vaccine programme and said they would "conduct educational outreach É so that there is a public understanding of what we are doing and why we are doing it, particularly because of the practice of bat-consumption in the region".

Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St Georges, University of London, who struggled to get work published showing that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had been carrying out "gain of function" work for years before the pandemic, said the research may have gone ahead even without the funding.

"This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line," he said.

Daszak was also behind a letter published in The Lancet last year which effectively shut down scientific debate into the origins of Covid-19.

Viscount Ridley, who has co-authored a book on the origin of Covid-19, due for release in November, and who has frequently called for a further investigation into what caused the pandemic in the House of Lords, said: "For more than a year I tried repeatedly to ask questions of Peter Daszak with no response.

"Now it turns out he had authored this vital piece of information about virus work in Wuhan but refused to share it with the world. I am furious. So should the world be.

"Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and Ôbatified' mice, and much, much more."

A Covid-19 researcher from the World Health Organisation (WHO), who wished to remain anonymous, said it was alarming that the grant proposal included plans to enhance the more deadly disease of Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome (Mers).

"The scary part is they were making infectious chimeric Mers viruses," the source said.

"These viruses have a fatality rate over 30 per cent, which is at least an order of magnitude more deadly than Sars-CoV-2.

"If one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly, while maintaining its lethality, this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic."

EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology have been aproached for comment.

© Telegraph Media Group Limited 2021

(2) Proposal would create chimeric viruses to infect human beings via "human-specific cleavage sites"

https://sputniknews.com/20210922/ecohealth-alliance-darpa-toyed-with-infecting-wild-chinese-bats-with-covid-leaked-docs-allege-1089302051.html

EcoHealth Alliance, DARPA Toyed With Infecting Wild Chinese Bats With Covid, Leaked Docs Allege

22.09.2021

The debate over the origins of the novel coronavirus, which has now killed over 4.7 million mostly elderly and immunocompromised people throughout the world and caused untold economic suffering, continues, with China and the United States engaged in a high-stakes information campaign to convince humanity that the other country is responsible.

In 2018, Peter Daszak, the British-born zoologist and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, the US organisation known for funneling millions of dollars in US National Institutes of Health funding into risky research at the Wuhan lab, submitted a funding request to DARPA ­ the Pentagon's top-secret military research agency, to deliberately release genetically-modified coronavirus particles into wild Chinese bat populations, leaked grant proposal papers suggest.

The $14.2 million funding request, published by DRASTIC Research, a loose collection of independent scientists investigating Covid-19's origins, is said to have sought the cash to create airborne, skin-penetrating coronavirus particles and spread them into bat caves in China's Yunnan province, ostensibly to inoculate the animals against illnesses that could jump to human beings.

The complex nano-particles were said to contain "novel chimeric spike proteins." Situated on the outside of the coronavirus, the spike protein the means by which SARS-CoV-2 enters human cells.

The funding request was made some 18 months before the appearance of the first cases of Covid-19 in China's Hubei province, with that outbreak eventually growing into a global pandemic.

The leaked papers further allege that the DARPA funding request included a proposal to create genetically-enhanced chimeric viruses that could infect human beings more easily by genetically manipulating bat coronaviruses to introduce "human-specific cleavage sites," thereby making it easier for a virus to enter human cells. The scientific justification for such research is unclear.

Furthermore, the request was also said to have proposed genetically mixing components of natural coronaviruses with the potential to cause serious complications with milder but more infections strains. This included plans to make more infectious versions of Mers ­ the extremely deadly virus which has a fatality rate of nearly 33 percent. The reasons as to why Daszack proposed this potentially dangerous research are again unclear.

EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology have not commented on DRASTIC's document dump. However, an unnamed former Trump administration official told The Telegraph that the leaked papers are genuine.

Among the leaked papers is a two-page response by DARPA rejecting Daszak's research proposal. The reply said noted that "if funding became available," and certain dual-use related risks were mitigated, "certain components of particular interest could have gone ahead."

However, DARPA said that in the proposal's then-current form, "it is clear that the proposed DEFUSE project [the proposed project's formal name] led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk by failing to consider" issues including gain of function, "dual use research of concern," vaccine epitope coverage, regulatory requirements and various ethical, legal and social issues.

Angus Dalgleish, a British professor and oncologist at St. George's Hospital Medical School in London who has spent over a year investigating the Wuhan Covid lab leak theory, told The Telegraph that Daszak and his colleagues at Wuhan may have proceeded with the research despite DARPA's refusal to fund it.

"This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line," Dalgleish said of the documents.

An unnamed Covid researcher from the World Health Organization said they found the proposal to create a chimeric Mers virus particularly "scary," given the virus's deadliness compared to Sars-CoV-2. "If one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly [to Sars-CoV-2] while maintaining its lethality, this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic," the WHO researcher warned.

EcoHealth Alliance, Daszak, and Anthony Fauci

The possible role of Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance in funding potentially dangerous coronavirus bat research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology using US government money became the subject of congressional scrutiny this summer, when Kentucky Senator Rand Paul grilled White House chief medical advisor Anthony Fauci over his alleged role in approving such funding after it was banned in the US. Fauci has denied any wrongdoing, and in a briefing earlier this month, White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki assured reporters that his job was safe amid allegations that he lied to Congress in his testimony.

Psaki's comments followed the publication of a new investigation by The Intercept which found that EcoHealth had been funding potentially dangerous pathogen research at Wuhan since 2014, with research reported to be continuing to this day.

(3) EcoHealth Alliance & Wuhan Institute of Virology colluded to carry out Gain of Gunction research - DRASTIC

https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/

D.R.A.S.T.I.C. Research

Exposed! How EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology Collaborated on a Dangerous Bat Coronavirus Project "The DARPA DEFUSE Project"

DRASTIC was recently made aware of documents provided by a whistleblower, which show that EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) in concert wIth the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) attempted to carry out advanced and dangerous human pathogenicity Bat Coronavirus research that would clearly qualify as Gain of function (GoF), in a grant proposal submitted to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2018.

Document 1. A brief DRASTIC Analysis of the EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE Proposal

DEFUSE PROJECT DRASTIC ANALYSIS Download Document 2: The Reasons why the DEFUSE Proposal was Rejected by DARPA

DEFUSE PROJECT REJECTION BY DARPA Download Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and "batified" mice.

The EHA / WIV proposal (named ÔDEFUSE') was ultimately rejected for full funding (but leaving open the door for partial funding), in part because it mis-interpreted the GOF guidelines.

In other words, a branch of the federal government had already judged aspects of EHA's research, and the corresponding shared research plan with the WIV, as falling under the definition of GOF, only for HHS to approve similar work without P3CO review in 2018 and 2019.

The documents seen by DRASTIC were made available by an anonymous source. They detail past achievements and planned experiments in collaboration with researchers from Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), East China Normal University (ECNU), UNC-Chapel Hill, Duke-National University in Singapore, the USGS National Wildlife Health Center (NWHC) and Palo Alto Research Center (PARC).

The grant proposal includes some elements of research that are already public via scientific papers, as well as other elements that have never been made public, including vaccinating wild bats using aerosolized viruses and further work on published and unpublished strains that could have directly produced SARS-CoV-2.

These grant proposal documents also show a staggering level of deep involvement of EHA with the WIV, on matters of national interest (such as DURC), for instance by proposing that the DARPA grant pays a good chunk of key WIV researchers salaries, or that some of these researchers should be invited to DARPA headquarters in Arlington. All the while without proper risk assessment and considerations for ethical and social issues and incorrect evaluation of what constitutes GoF research.

Daszak's Plan The actual DEFUSE Proposal Documents will be published in due course.

D.R.A.S.T.I.C. (Decentralised Radical Autonomous Search Teams Investigating Covid-19)

drasticresearch.org

(4) One of the resulting viruses was more pathogenic than the starting virus. NIH thus funded GoF - Richard Ebright

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2021/September/PDF/new-cache-of-documents-exposes-lies-to-congress-pdf.pdf

New Cache of Documents Exposes Lies to Congress

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

September 11, 2021

Freedom of Information Act litigation by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has resulted in the release of 900+ pages of previously undisclosed documents detailing the work of EcoHealth Alliance, an NIH/NIAID-funded organization that subcontracted gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China

Released documents include two previously unpublished grant proposals funded by the NIAID and project updates relating to EcoHealth Alliance's research.

The documents allegedly reveal a novel SARS-related coronavirus was created that was more pathogenic to humanized mice than the virus from which it was constructed. [...]

According to Richard Ebright, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University, an NIH grant for research involving the modification of bat coronaviruses at the WIV was sneaked through because the NIAID didn't flag it for review.11

In other words, the WIV received federal funding from the NIAID without the research first receiving a green-light from the HHS review board. The NIAID apparently used a convenient loophole in the review framework. As it turns out, it's the funding agency's responsibility to flag potential gain-of-function research for review. If it doesn't, the review board has no knowledge of it.

According to Ebright, the NIAID and NIH have "systemically thwarted Ñ indeed systematically nullified Ñ the HHS P3CO Framework by declining to flag and forward proposals for review."12

Identifying, Altering Coronaviruses Likely to Infect Humans As reported by The Intercept, under the "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" grant,13 EcoHealth Alliance received a total of $3.1 million, $599,000 of which went to the WIV to identify and alter bat coronaviruses suspected of being able to infect humans.

The materials É reveal for the first time that one of the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses Ñ one not been previously disclosed publicly Ñ was more pathogenic to humanized mice than the starting virus from which it was constructed É and thus not only was reasonably anticipated to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity, but, indeed, was demonstrated to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity. - Dr. Richard Ebright, Ph.D. [...]

(5) Case that Covid is Bioweapon, & Genetic Vaccines are Genocide, brought to International Criminal Court

The case was brought to the ICC by cardiologist Dr Richard Fleming, virologist Prof. Luc Montagnier, and neuroscientist Dr. Kevin W. McCairn. The ICC is a Globalist institution, so Globalists will pressure it not to proceed. This will be a test of whether it's captive. - Peter M.

https://www.flemingmethod.com/international-criminal-court

Dr Richard Fleming

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is responsible for investigating and charging perpetrators who have committed genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression.

After more than a year of investigation, and following several months of discussions with several attorneys in various countries, I entered into an agreement to provide Expert Witness Testimony, along with Nobel Laureate Virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier, and renown neuroscientist Kevin W. McCairn, PhD, in cases that have been filed for joint submission to the ICC.

The countries involved include the United Kingdom, France, Czech Republic, Slovakia, with other countries set to join soon.

The specifics of those accused of being perpetrators of Crimes Against Humanity is for the moment confidential as the ICC considers the submitted material.

The attorneys for the United Kingdom have posted a Press Release 17 August 2021.

https://21a86421-c3e0-461b-83c2-cfe4628dfadc.filesusr.com/ugd/659775_f7cc9a4b3d7c456592cabe037f76dab6.pdf

Tuesday the 17th of August 2021

Additional claim made to the International Criminal Court

On the 20th of April this year we the undersigned, issued a 27-page 'Request for Investigation' (Request), to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, alleging that certain members of the UK government and its advisors, were complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.

On the 28th of April 2021 we received a formal acknowledgement from the ICC and were assigned a case number (143/21). Unlike some other countries, our Request has not been rejected within a few weeks of submission, but neither has it been formally accepted and so the status of our Request has effectively been in limbo for the past few months.

Notwithstanding the above, we have continued to collect and review any new research and evidence that could be used in our ICC claim should it be accepted for investigation and we have also been actively establishing connections with lawyers and research scientists from around the world.

Given the very substantial amount of new evidence and information that has come to light since we originally issued our Request in April, we made the decision to issue a further claim to the ICC. We are very pleased to have secured sworn affidavits from leading experts, who are in the first instance: the research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.

We now have compelling evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 'vaccines' are deliberately engineered bioweapons which have been released in two phases on the unsuspecting peoples of the world.

We are particularly pleased that we have kindly been given exclusive access to an advance copy of Dr Richard M. Fleming's new book, Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation, which we believe will provide incontrovertible evidence to the ICC of the bioweapon nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the so-called COVID-19 vaccines.

We have also been in discussions with lawyers from several other countries, about the possibility of amalgamating in order to submit a combined Request to the ICC. We are pleased to announce that we have now been joined by lawyers who have filed ICC Requests from Slovakia, France and the Czech Republic and on the 12th of August 2021, we sent a letter to the ICC requesting that we be allowed to submit a joint claim.

At the same time we also submitted preliminary evidence for the allegations which are common to us all, whilst asking to reserve the right to have investigated by the ICC, the claims specific to our individual countries, eg. re the UK, we have requested an examination of the genocide of the elderly that took place in care homes and hospitals and the inappropriate use of midazolam and morphine. We have also requested in our joint claim, that there be an immediate moratorium on the entire COVID-19 'vaccine' program in all four of our countries and an end to the testing of asymptomatic people.

We now await the decision of the ICC as to whether a) they will allow in principle a joint claim by several countries to be made and b) they will accept our joint 'Request for Investigation'.

Given the extremely serious nature of the situation that pertains in all four of our countries with regards to escalating medical apartheid, the loss of basic freedoms and rights and the ever-increasing, very high number of deaths and serious adverse events suffered by recipients of COVID-19 'vaccines', we have brought to the attention of the ICC the urgent need for the Court to act swiftly and without further delay and to this end we have requested a meeting at The Hague as soon as is practicable.

Whilst we await a response from the ICC, we continue to be in discussions with lawyers in other countries who have not yet filed their individual Requests to the ICC, but who have indicated they wish to join us and we intend to give them our every assistance.

We will issue another update as and when we have further news. In the meantime, we thank each and every person who is helping in the fight for truth, justice and freedom and indeed for the very future of humanity, against the forces of immense evil. "But let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream". Kaira S. McCallum Melinda C. Mayne London email - KSM.MCM@protonmail.com

(6) ICC case alleges World Governments Are Complicit in Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity

New Evidence, Including a Sworn Affidavit from Prof. Luc A. Montagnier, has been Submitted to the International Criminal Court Alleging World Governments Are Complicit in Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/lawyers-worldwide-submit-new-evidence-to-international-criminal-court-alleging-world-leaders-scientific-advisors-have-used-covid-19-the-injections-to-commit-genocide-and-crimes-against-hum/

Lawyers Worldwide Submit New Evidence to International Criminal Court Alleging World Leaders & Scientific Advisors Have Used Covid-19 & the Injections to Commit Genocide and Crimes against Humanity

Charles Burris

Lawyers Worldwide Submit New Evidence to International Criminal Court Alleging World Leaders & Scientific Advisors Have Used Covid-19 & the Injections to Commit Genocide and Crimes against Humanity

New evidence, including sworn affidavits from leading experts such as Professor Luc A. Montagnier, has been submitted to the International Criminal Court by lawyers in several countries alleging Government's across the world and their advisors are complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.

Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum submitted a 27-page ÔRequest for Investigation' to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague back in April 2021 alleging the UK Government and its advisors were complicit in crimes against humanity in the name of Covid-19.

On the 28th of April 2021, the pair received a formal acknowledgement from the ICC and were assigned a case number ­ Ô141/21'. Since then the pair have been gathering new evidence to use in their ICC claim and have established connections with lawyers and research scientists from around the world.

A new press release released on the 17th August, which can be viewed here, confirms that the pair have received sworn affidavits from leading experts including research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier, and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.

Professor Luc A Montagnier, who won a Nobel prize for his work on the HIV virus, claimed in April 2020 that he believed the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Then in May 2021 the expert virologist stated that "Mass vaccinations are a scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants".

(7) Luc Montagnier blamed vaccines for triggering the creation of COVID-19 variants

https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/09/17/case-filed-against-covid-19-vaccines-in-international-criminal-court-rising-infections-in-vaccinated.html

Case Filed Against COVID-19 Vaccines in International Criminal Court, Rising Infections in Vaccinated

By Author: Jonathan Walker

September 17, 2021

On April 20, UK-based attorneys Melinda C. Mayne and Kaira S. McCallum submitted a 27-page "Request for Investigation" to the International Criminal Court (ICC). In the request, the duo accused members of the UK government and its advisors of being complicit in crimes against humanity, genocide, and breach of the Nuremberg Code in the name of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. [...]

In an interview with Hold-Up Media in May, Montagnier blamed vaccines for triggering the creation of COVID-19 variants. The French virologist called the mass COVID-19 vaccination program an "unacceptable mistake," and a "scientific error as well as a medical error." He said that antibodies created by the vaccine force the SARS-CoV-2 virus to mutate into new variants.

"What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution? It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination," Montagnier said. He added that the trend can be seen in "each country" where the "curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths."

Vaccines, infections, and deaths

The issue of rising COVID-19 infections after vaccination was raised back in February by a group of medical doctors. In an open letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the doctors highlighted numerous reports of "care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents." The doctors stated that they were concerned about the issue and that there is not much scrutiny regarding the matter.

"We question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)," the letter stated.

According to a Sept. 15 report published by Dr. Joseph Mercola, New York Times bestselling author and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, vaccinated patients are flooding hospitals around the world.

On Aug. 1, Israel's director of Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, revealed that 50 percent of COVID-19 infections were among fully vaccinated individuals. Data from Scotland shows that 87 percent of those who have died from COVID-19 in the third wave of the pandemic, which began in July, were inoculated.

Among citizens above 50 years of age in the UK, vaccinated people account for 68 percent of hospitalizations and 70 percent of deaths. In Iceland, where more than 82 percent of the population has received vaccines, 77 percent of new COVID-19 cases have been in fully vaccinated people. Between July 6 and 24, 74 percent of those diagnosed with COVID-19 and 80 percent of those hospitalized in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccines.

A British study published in mid-August found that fully vaccinated individuals who contract COVID-19 have a higher viral load in their nasal passages than unvaccinated individuals who are infected. The same was found in a study conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

In addition, a new study published on medRxiv showed that healthy boys who received mRNA COVID-19 shots were more at risk of developing heart inflammation after vaccination than being hospitalized for COVID-19. For boys aged 12 to 17 who did not have underlying medical conditions. The cardiac adverse events (CAE) observed occurred a median of two days after vaccination, and 91.9% occurred within five days.

(8) Joseph Mercola reviews 'Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?' by Dr. Richard Fleming

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/09/12/is-covid-19-a-bioweapon.aspx

Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

September 12, 2021

o In his book, "Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation," Dr. Richard Fleming documents evidence showing SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon created over the past two decades Once you conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon, you must also recognize that the COVID shots are nothing more than the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon. In other words, they are bioweapons too

o The same people involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the same people who have interfered with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same people who have been involved in the development of these COVID shots

o Health care workers are injecting people with something they cannot possibly give informed consent for, which means health care workers are violating their Hippocratic Oath

o Health care workers who give these COVID shots are also violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and other legal statutes

Helping you take control of your health in these crazy times is Dr. Richard Fleming, a prolific author in addition to being a physicist, a nuclear cardiologist, researcher and attorney.

Here, we discuss his latest book "Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation," slated for release September 7, 2021. It's currently available for preorder on Amazon. It's an incredibly well-documented book and contains history that many of us aren't aware of. As it turns out, the creation of this virus goes back not a year or two but two decades.

"My area of aptitude [is] physics and calculus, the mathematic language for that. Physics, and particularly high energy particle physics, is something that I find very fascinating. [...]

"Eventually we either stand behind principles or we acquiesce and become nothing more than the German doctors of Nazi Germany during World War II," he says. "And as history showed us, they eventually paid a price at the Nuremberg Trials É [...]

Early on in 2020, Fleming started researching treatment options for SARS-CoV-2 using the Fleming Method, which you can learn more about on flemingmethod.com. Using this method, you can measure how a given intervention works on the tissue level, and how infection or inflammation is responding to the treatment.

He ended up developing 52 treatment combinations, and over the course of that study, the length of hospitalization stays went from five to six weeks down to one to two weeks. But he also learned something else.

"In the process of doing that research, I dug more and more and investigated what was going on, and that led me into the background of the research that many of these people had been doing," Fleming explains.

"Tens of millions of dollars have been funneled out of the U.S., and Anthony Fauci has helped with that. He's been on those committees. You can see the grant numbers in the book."

Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?

While gain-of-function can be used for benevolent purposes, it can just as easily be used for nefarious ones, "and that's kind of what you see happening," Fleming says.

"You see real efforts to produce viruses, coronaviruses, in particular. Spike proteins of coronaviruses to be even more specific, as I show in the book, paid for by the federal government by people who say they were not involved in gain-of-function research.

Well, their fingerprints are on the documents, or on the published papers or on the grants or on the patents. You can't say that you're not involved in things when the documents show differently. They show the work and the money that came out of the federal government that went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, that went to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other places.

For me, as a researcher, obviously, once I start to investigate something, the only way you can stop me from doing that is to put a bullet in my head. Otherwise, I'm going to stay after it. There are things that are not in the book that are going to come out in international criminal court, things I'm saving for that, because this virus is, by definition, a biological weapon.

It violates the biological weapons convention treaty. You just have to look at the definitions. It provides nothing useful to humanity. It's dangerous. When Fort Detrick is involved and the Department of Defense is involved É and you see these monies and you see the people that are involved, you realize that É the United States was playing China, China was playing the United States, and you saw who got caught in between. And they're still playing the game. [...]

(9) "We Made Sars. And We Patented It On 19/4/2002, before there was any alleged outbreak in Asia"

- David E. Martin testifies at the German Corona Inquiry Committee July 9th, 2021.

This is from Jeff J. Brown, of ChinaRising

https://chinarising.puntopress.com/2021/09/07/we-made-sars-and-we-patented-it-on-19-4-2002-before-there-was-any-alleged-outbreak-in-asia-david-e-martin-testifies-at-the-german-corona-inquiry-committee-july-9th-2021-avtran/

Full written transcript provided by China Rising Radio SinolandÉ

[...] With respect to the spike proteins behavior is anything novel at all. As a matter of fact, it's twenty two years old based on patent filings. What's more problematic and what is actually the most egregious problem is that Anthony Fauci and NIAID. Found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines, and so SARS is actually not a natural progression of a genetic modification of coronavirus.

As a matter of fact, very specifically, in nineteen ninety nine, Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill specifically to create and you cannot you cannot help but lament what I'm about to read, because this comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19th, 2002. And you heard the date correctly, 2002 where the NIAID built and infectious replication, defective coronavirus. They were specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words, we made SARS.

And we patented it on April 19th, 2002, before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia, which, as you know, followed that by several months. That patent issued as US patent seven to seven nine three two seven. That patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew that the ace receptor, the ACE two binding domain, the S1 spike protein and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen.

And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as a means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine. [...]

But the alleged outbreak that took place in China in 2002 going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April, 2003 filing by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention. And this topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise, because in addition to filing the entire gene sequence on what became SARS coronavirus. Which is actually a violation of thirty five US Code Section 101, you cannot patent a naturally occurring substance.

The thirty five US code section one on one violation was patent number 7220852. Now, that patent also had a series of derivative patents associated with it. These are our patent applications that were broken apart because they were of multiple patentable subject matter. But these include US Patent 46492703 P, which is actually a very interesting designation. The US Patent 776521 that is 7776521. These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus, but also covered the means of detecting it using rPCR.

Now, the reason why that's a problem is if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to being able to control one hundred percent of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection, meaning you have entire scientific and message control. And this patent sought by the CDC was allegedly justified by their public relations team as being sought so that everyone would be free to be able to research coronavirus.

The only problem with that statement is it's a lie. And the reason why it's a lie is because the patent office, not once but twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as un-patentable because the gene sequence was already in the public domain. In other words, prior to CDC filing for a patent. The patent office found ninety nine point nine percent identity with the already existing coronavirus recorded in the public domain and over the rejection of the patent examiner.

And after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overrode the patent office's rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007 got the patent on SARS coronavirus. Though every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the patent office. This is not something that's subtle. And to make matters worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. [...]

And by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence. Written by none other than Ralph Baric. Was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation. Seventy three times. [...]

David- Peter Daszak the person who is independently corroborating that Chinese non lab non theory because there wasn't a lab leak. This was an intentional bio weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released. And every study that's ever been launched to try to verify a lab leak is a red herring. [...]

Comment (Peter M.):

David Martin overlooks the Chinese patents, e.g. a Chinese patent for coronavirus S gene (2004):

https://patents.google.com/patent/CN1276777C/en?q=pshuttle-SN&oq=pshuttle-SN SARS vaccine of adenovirus vector and preparation method, application of coronavirus S gene Application number CN 200410044285 Filing date 2004-05-18 Publication date 2006-09-27.

And a Chinese Patent genetic engineering protein FSPA relevant to S protein of coronavirus SARS- CoV (2005):

http://europepmc.org/article/pat/CN1990502 Coronal virus genetic engineering protein and use thereof XU JINPING MENG Patent: Unexamined APPLIC. open to Public inspection - China Application: CN20051120530 on 27 Dec 2005 Publication: 27 Dec 2005

Martin also overlooks the manipulation of the virus that was being done at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment, and at Wuhan Institute of Virology: https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/

In a March 15, 2016 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, titled "SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence", Baric et. al. thanked Shi Zhengli of WIV for supplying the bat samples. The paper is at https://www.pnas.org/content/113/11/3048 . It states,

"ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein."

This means that American experimenters were using bat genetic material from WIV. Shi Zhengli had collaborated with them on many occasions.

Ralph Baric gave an interview (9 min), in which he admits that manipulation of a virus can be done without leaving a signature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kt9pVYgqkI

Even though the Chinese and US virologists seemed to be in partnership, Chinese scientists have recently been caught stealing Western technology and taking it home to China, as part of the Thousand Talents Plan promoted by its Government for technology transfer. So, no doubt, each side in this compact had its own agenda.

Now, both sides are covering up their role.

A PLA scientist was the first to file a patent for a Covid-19 vaccine, on February 24 2020: https://www.dailywire.com/news/top-chinese-military-scientist-filed-coronavirus-vaccine-patent-in-february-2020-died-mysteriously-report

Given the long development time, as Nikolai Petrovsky indicates, this suggests that the PLA was experimenting with SARS-COV-2 before the outbreak of Covid-19 That's why Zhou's death was hardly mentioned - they did not want to draw attention to this anomaly: http://mailstar.net/coronavirus.html#PLA-scientist

(10) Peter Daszak acknowledged that the manipulation of the viris was done not by himself, but by "my colleagues in China"

- by Peter Myers, July 14, 2021

Dr David E Martin is an expert in Finance. His particular interest is Patents - and he has examined ALL the patents for Coronaviruses filed in the US since the first, in 1999. Ralph Baric holds most of these patents; but the CDC holds some.

Dr Martin mentions Shi Zhengli only once, but she and others at Wuhan Institute of Virology also hold patents on Coronaviruses: http://mailstar.net/coronavirus.html

Patents connect science and business; Big Pharma needs patents to keep prices high.

Dr Martin quotes Peter Daszak on the connection between media hype and the profits Big Pharma can reap:

"Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated."

David E Martin implies that the US created Sars-Cov2.

However, Daszak acknowledged that the manipulation of the viris was done not by himself, but by "my colleagues in China".

In a 2016 c-span video, Daszak describes "insert[ing] spike proteins" into viruses to see if they can "bind to human cells".

Watch a clip of that part at https://rumble.com/vi94ht-explosive-video-shows-peter-daszak-bragging-about-creating-killer-viruses-w.html

Daszak admits that Gain of Function experiments are being conducted by "my colleagues in China" - with his collaboration:

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/daszak-reveals-chinese-colleagues-manipulating-coronaviruses/

The National Pulse.

EXCLUSIVE WATCH: Explosive, Unearthed Video Shows Peter Daszak Describing 'Chinese Colleagues' Developing 'Killer' Coronaviruses.

JUNE 8, 2021

NATALIE WINTERS

{https://www.c-span.org/video/?404875-1/pandemics at 1:17:06 - 37}

"Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we ... Well I didn't do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people.

"You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers," he adds.

The comments follow growing evidence that Fauci's NIAID has deep financial and personnel ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology ­ and that Daszak's EcoHealth alliance was one of the primary proxies funneling the money to the Chinese Communist Party lab. ==

Comment (Peter M): Could US specialists such as Baric and Daszak have deliberately helped China develop a bioweapon? Whether that was their intention we do not know, but Event 201 rehearsed the responses that have transformed our lives, as if the whole thing were planned.

(11) Chinese whistleblower alleges Chinese gov't spread COVID-19 at Wuhan Military Games, October 2019

https://www.rebelnews.com/ex-chinese_communist_party_insider_claims_covid-19_was_deliberately_spread_at_october_2019_military_world_games_in_wuhan

Chinese whistleblower claims COVID-19 was deliberately spread at October 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan

Rebel News previously revealed that Canadian soldiers had been among those infected with a severe respiratory illness at the October 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan Ñ and that the Trudeau government had gone to extensive lengths to try and cover it up.

By Dakota Christensen | September 22, 2021

Chinese whistleblower claims COVID-19 was deliberately spread at October 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan

A whistleblower has alleged that the Chinese government intentionally spread COVID-19 at the October 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, China. The games occurred two months prior to when China first notified the World Health Organization about the virus.

In a previous report, Rebel News revealed that Canadian soldiers had been among those infected with a severe respiratory illness at the October 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan Ñ and that the Trudeau government had gone to extensive lengths to try and cover it up.

Wei Jingsheng, who is an ex-Chinese Communist Party insider, has now claimed that the Chinese government deliberately spread the COVID-19 virus at the World Military Games. He suspects that the international military tournament could have acted as the virus' first 'superspreader' event, the Daily Mail reports.

"I thought the Chinese government would take this opportunity to spread the virus during the Military Games, as many foreigners would show up there," Jingsheng told Sky News in their new documentary, What Really Happened in Wuhan.

Jingsheng, who was exiled to the U.S. years earlier, claimed that he had heard from current Communist Party insiders that the Chinese government was carrying out an "unusual exercise" during the games.

"[I knew] of the possibility of the Chinese government using some strange weapons, including biological weapons, because I knew they were doing experiments of that sort," he said.

The Chinese regime worked desperately to shut down whistleblowers and silence any discussion of the virus in the early stages of the outbreak. Any references to the virus made on social media were censored and medical staff who tried to speak out were reportedly detained and forced to sign false confessions of "spreading false rumours."

Jingsheng claims he expressed his concerns about the situation to senior figures within the Trump administration in November 2019, but that his claims were not taken seriously.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10014895/Ex-Chinese-Communist-Party-insider-Wei-Jingsheng-speaks-Wuhan-theory-relating-Covid-19.html

Chinese whistleblower claims first COVID outbreak was INTENTIONAL and happened in October 2019 at Military World Games in Wuhan - two months before China notified the world about virus

By CHARLIE COË and LEVI PARSONS FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA

PUBLISHED: 12:44 AEST, 22 September 2021 | UPDATED: 00:17 AEST, 23 September 2021

A whistleblower has sensationally claimed China deliberately spread Covid at a military tournament two months before the rest of the world knew about the deadly virus.

Ex-Chinese Communist Party insider Wei Jingsheng said The World Military Games in October 2019 could have acted as the virus' first superspreader event.

The international tournament for military athletes was held in Wuhan - the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic - two months before China notified the World Health Organisation about its first cases.

Mr Jingsheng claimed it was no coincidence some of the 9,000 international athletes who gathered for the event reportedly became sick with a mystery illness.

'I thought the Chinese government would take this opportunity to spread the virus during the Military Games, as many foreigners would show up there,' he told the new Sky News documentary What Really Happened in Wuhan.

The whistleblower claimed he had heard of the Chinese government carrying out an 'unusual exercise' during the games.

'[I knew] of the possibility of the Chinese government using some strange weapons, including biological weapons, because I knew they were doing experiments of that sort,' he said.

His claims were supported by the former Principal China Adviser to the US State Department Miles Yu.

He said French, German and American athletes were among those to fall ill at the tournament with Covid-like symptoms, but were never tested for the virus.

China's official timeline of the coronavirus pandemic vs counter-claims

Official timeline

Dec 8, 2019 - Earliest date that China has acknowledged an infection Dec 31 - China first reported 'pneumonia of unknown cause' to the World Health Organisation Jan 1, 2020 - Wuhan seafood market closed for disinfection Jan 7 - President Xi Jinping discusses coronavirus outbreak with his politburo Jan 9 - China makes public the genome of the coronavirus Jan 11 - China reported its first death Jan 13 - First case outside China is confirmed Jan 20 - China's National Health Commission confirms human-to-human transmission Jan 23 - Wuhan locked down Jan 31 - WHO declared 'outbreak of international concern' as China admitted having thousands of cases Feb 23 - Italy reports cluster of cases in first major outbreak in the West May 29 - China claims virus did not originate in wet markets but in Chinese bats before it jumped to humans via an 'intermediary animal' July 31 - Chinese researcher admits some coronavirus experiments conducted in lower biosafety labs Dec 16 - WHO announces it will travel to Wuhan to probe origins of virus in January Jan 5, 2021 - China denies entry to WHO's investigatory team Feb 9 - WHO dismisses theory virus leaked from lab - backs China's claim it was imported from frozen meat Mar 28 - Former US national security officials says intel shows 'there was a direct order from Beijing to destroy all viral samples' at Wuhan lab

New evidence

Sep 2019- Blood samples are taken in a lung cancer screening trial in Italy which later test positive for coronavirus

Oct - Whistleblower Wei Jingsheng claims China deliberately spread Covid at The World Military Games in Wuhan in October, two months before the rest of the world knew about the virus

Oct - Xi Jinping's authoritarian regime tried desperately to shut down whistle-blowers like Mr Jingsheng. Any references made in social media about a new SARS virus or 'outbreak' were censored

Oct-Dec - Rise in 'flu and pneumonia' cases in northern Italy which could be linked to coronavirus

Nov - Whistleblower Mr Jingsheng claims he took his concerns about the military games to senior figures within the Trump administration but was ignored

Nov - Intelligence report passed to agencies in Washington claims three members of staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology sought hospital treatment in November 2019 after experiencing symptoms consistent with Covid

Nov - Sewage samples taken in Florianópolis, Brazil, suggest virus was present

Nov 10 - Milanese woman has a skin biopsy, producing a sample which later shows signs of the virus

Nov 17 - Leaked documents suggest case detected in China on this date

Dec - Doctors in China, including Li Wenliang, report existance of new type of respiratory infection. But Chinese police arrested him and eight of his colleagues for questioning - instead of publicising reports and warning public

Dec 1 - Chinese researchers report an infection on this date in a peer-reviewed study, but it has not been acknowledged by Beijing

Dec 18 - Sewage samples taken in Milan and Turin suggest virus was circulating in the cities

Dec 26 - Samples analysed suggested a new type of SARS was circulating as early as December 26, but Wuhan was not locked down until January 22

Jan 2020 - Sewage samples from Barcelona suggest virus was in the city

Jan 3 - Covid-19 infections begin sweeping across other nations including the U.S. as the WHO labelled the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern

May - Scientists at a government lab in California concluded that Covid-19 may have escaped from a facility in Wuhan

July - WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said China failed share vital raw data during their investigation in Wuhan. China rebuffed those claims

August 2021: The world's first Covid-19 patient may have been infected by a bat while working for a Wuhan lab in China, WHO chief Dr Peter Embarek said

August: A damning report by Republicans in the US claims coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, shortly after the facility tried to improve air safety and waste treatment systems

The report also cited 'ample evidence' that lab scientists were working to modify coronaviruses to infect humans and such manipulation could be hidden

'We see some indications in our own dataÉ that there was Covid circulating in the United States as early as early December, possibly earlier than that,' ex-US State Department Covid-19 investigator David Asher said.

Mr Jingsheng also claims he took his concerns about the unfolding situation to senior figures within the Trump administration in November 2019 but was ignored.

The long-time democracy campaigner, who has served time in prison for 'counter-revolutionary activities', said he made the approach as whispers of a 'new SARS virus' began circulating on WeChat and other Chinese social media platforms.

'I felt they were not as concerned as I was, so I tried my best to provide more detail and information,' he said.

'They may not believe that a government of a country would do something like that (cover up a virus), so I kept repeating myself in an effort É to persuade them.'

Xi Jinping's authoritarian regime tried desperately to shut down whistle-blowers and silence any discussion of the virus in the early stages of the Wuhan outbreak - even when an untold number of corpses started flooding the city's hospitals.

Any references made in social media about a new SARS virus or 'outbreak' were censored and brave medical staff who tried to speak out and warn the world were detained and forced to sign false confessions of panic-stirring. [...]

Comment (Peter M.): I can't believe that either China or the US deliberately released Sars-Cov-2, because each would have known that it would spread to their own country. Further, if China released it, it would not have been in denial when it spread in Wuhan.

(12) Fauci lied to Congress when he claimed he never funded Gain-of-Function research; punishable by five years in prison

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2021/September/PDF/fauci-lied-to-congress-pdf.pdf

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

September 09, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Paul Thacker, a former investigator with the U.S. Senate, says Dr. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress when he claimed he's never funded Gain-of-Function research. This is a federal offense punishable by up to five years in prison, provided the false statements are materially relevant and knowingly false

July 20, 2021, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul Ñ who has grilled Fauci about his research funding in two separate hearings in 2021 Ñ announced he would ask the DOJ for a criminal referral, as he's convinced Fauci made false statements to Congress

One "smoking gun" is a research article written by Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) scientists. The paper acknowledges funding from the NIAID/NIH, and the research meets the Department of Health and Human Services' definition of Gain-of-Function research

According to the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, "The term 'Gain-of-Function' is generally used to refer to changes resulting in the acquisition of new, or an enhancement of existing, biological phenotypes"

In a June 2021 essay, professor Jeffrey Sachs, head of The Lancet's commission tasked with investigating COVID's origin, described how the NIAID has funded Gain-of-Function research at the WIV, stating it's "common knowledge in the U.S. scientific community that NIH has É supported genetic recombinant research on SARS-like viruses that many scientists describe as GOFROC [Gain-of-Function research of concern]"

In an August 31, 2021, substack article,1 Paul Thacker, an investigative reporter and former investigator with the U.S. Senate, reviews evidence he claims shows Dr. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress, an offense punishable by up to five years in prison, provided the false statements are materially relevant and knowingly false.

"A new investigative documentary by the U.K.'s Channel 42 detailed some of the strongest evidence to date that the COVID19 pandemic may have started from a lab leak in Wuhan, China," Thacker writes.3

"At the very least, the documentary's interviews with experts and review of documents made explicit how China has misled the world about its research with dangerous pathogens É

The documentary clarified one other point: Anthony Fauci lied before Congress and the American public when he claimed during a congressional hearing that he has not funded Gain-of-Function research conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology É

President Biden has campaigned on honesty and decency. The question now for President Biden is, 'What will you do with Fauci now that he has broken the law and violated the public trust by lying before Congress?'"

Fauci Redefines Scientific Terms on the Fly

In what appears to be an attempt to extricate himself from blame for the COVID pandemic, Fauci Ñ director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), an arm of the National Institutes for Health (NIH), since 1986 Ñ denied ever having funded Gain-of-Function research at the WIV or elsewhere when questioned by members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee in May 2021.4

The term 'Gain-of-Function' is generally used to refer to changes resulting in the acquisition of new, or an enhancement of existing, biological phenotypes. ~ National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity

According to Thacker, the evidence clearly refutes this. One "smoking gun" is a research article written by WIV scientists titled "Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-Related Coronaviruses Provides New Insights Into the Origin of SARS Coronavirus."5 This research was funded by the NIH and meets the Department of Health and Human Services' definition of Gain-of-Function research.6,7

The Channel 4 documentary addressed this paper. When asked whether the NIH ever funded Gain-of-Function research at the WIV, David Relman, a research physician at Stanford University, replies, "Yes. Indirectly, but yes. How do we know? The paper says, right on the front page, 'Supported by NIAID, NIH.'" The clip featuring Relman is included below.

As previously reported by the National Review,8 we know the WIV received NIAID/NIH funding to create novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses capable of infecting both human cells and lab animals. "Chimeric viruses" refers to artificial man-made viruses, hybrid organisms created through the joining of two or more different organisms.

This is precisely what Gain-of-Function research is all about. According to a 2016 report9 from the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, "The term 'Gain-of-Function' is generally used to refer to changes resulting in the acquisition of new, or an enhancement of existing, biological phenotypes."

Fauci now wants to adopt a far narrower definition of Gain-of-Function research that takes into account the supposed intent behind the research, but that really doesn't make sense. Just because you don't set out with intent to harm doesn't mean yor creation can't cause harm or might inadvertently cause harm. [...]

(13) Elizabeth Warren & Adam Schiff demand Amazon ban Mercola book on Covid-19

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/09/20/us-officials-demand-ban-on-dr-mercolas-book.aspx

US Officials Demand Ban on Dr. MercolaÕs Book

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

September 20, 2021

Since the publication of my book, "The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal," which became an instant best seller on Amazon.com, thereÕs been a significant increase in censorship

September 7, 2021, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren sent a letter to the chief executive officer of Amazon.com, demanding an "immediate review" of AmazonÕs algorithms to weed out books peddling "COVID misinformation"

Warren specifically singled out "The Truth About COVID-19" as a prime example of "highly-ranked and favorably-tagged books based on falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccines and cures" that she wants to see banned from sale

September 9, 2021, U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff sent letters to Facebook and Amazon, also calling for more prolific censorship of vaccine information

Warren based her call to ban my book on a report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate, despite Facebook having discredited that report three weeks earlier, stating the CCDH manufactured a faulty narrative without evidence against the 12 individuals targeted in its report.

END

My other webpages on the Coronavirus are:

coronavirus.html- - Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance papers released, reveal that viruses were constructed in level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment - not at Wuhan Institute of Virology
coronavirus-remedies.html - Coronavirus Remedies - Chloroquine and Herbal Medicines
coronavirus-finance.html - Helicopter money: Central Banks should directly fund government deficits
Mikovits-Plandemic.html - Plandemic 1 and 2. Judy Mikovits on elite rule, and the role of Wuhan Institute of Virology
Barrett-webinar-Covid.html - Lab-made? Leaked or Unleashed?
Ivermectin-no-Lockdown.html - Placard at Sydney anti-Lockdown Protest: IF THE VACCINE WORKS - WHY THE NO LIABILITY CLAUSE?

Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.

END

Write to me at contact.html.

HOME