Judy Mikovits on the Coronavirus: Plans of the Elite, and the role of Wuhan Institute of Virology

- Peter Myers

Date: August 15, 2019

My comments are shown {thus}; write to me at contact.html.

You are at http://mailstar.net/Mikovits-Plandemic.html.

(1) Plandemic 1 and 2; Judy Mikovits on the role of Wuhan Institute of Virology
(2) Plandemic 1 video and Transcript
(3) Tracking the Origin - Epoch Times interviews Judy Mikovits
on the role of Wuhan Institute of Virology
(4) Plandemic 2 (Plandemic, Part 2); CDC and Ralp Baric (UNC) hold patents on Coronavirus
(5) Chinese patents for coronavirus S gene (2004), and S protein of coronavirus SARS-CoV (2005)
(6) John Hopkins University conducted pandemic simulations in 2001, 2005, 2018 & 2019
(7) Ralph Baric was a Speaker at WIV in 2018 (8th International Symposium on Emerging Viral Diseases)
(8) One Health Platform features Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance & Nick Juleff of Gates Foundation

(1) Plandemic 1 and 2, and Judy Mikovits on the role of Wuhan Institute of Virology

Peter Myers, Sept 1, 2020

The word "Plandemic" suggests a plan by the Globalist elite in the USA and Europe, an agenda-setting plan to impose worldwide mandatory vaccines issued by Big Pharma, with Quantum Dot tattoos under the skin to record evidence of vaccinations. A sort-of "mark of the beast". Plus surveillance, and suppression of dissent: a Totalitarian World Government.

Judy Mikovits does attest such a plan. But she has also stated that Wuhan Institute of Virology played a major role in Sars-Cov-2.

Nearly half-way through Pendemic 1, she says that Sars1 was manipulated, in a laboratory, to produce Sars2.

Here is the exchange:

"I: And do you have any ideas of where this occurred?

"M: Oh yeah, Iım sure it occurred between the North Carolina laboratories, Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the Wuhan laboratory.

"Clip speaker: $3.7 million flowed from the National Institutes of Health here in the US to the Wuhan lab in China, the same lab where many people have said that this coronavirus infection first originated. We also now know that NIAID, the department associated with the National Institutes of Health of which Anthony Fauci is in control, had already been conducting experiments with the Wuhan lab in the past in regard to coronavirus. If Dr. Anthony Fauci cannot be honest with the public about his connection to this lab, then Fauci has to go."

Mikovits expounded much more on that theme in an earlier interview with Joshua Philipp of the Epoch Times; the transcript of this is presented in Item 3.

Epoch Times, a Falun Gong publication, is hostile to the Chinese Communist Party; but Mikovits herself does not talk about the CCP.

In a similar but opposite way, Kevin Barrett and Michel Chossudovsky have argued that Sars-Cov-2 was a US attack on China, and that China played only a minor and passive role in its development.

I distance myself from both these ideological positions. Rather, I maintain that there are TWO bad guys, not one - the Deep State in the West, aiming for a World Government under its control, and Xi Jingping's government, aiming at Empire.

The major interviews in this video are with Judy Mikovits; Dr Sean Lin, a Chinese American, Former Lab Director of the Viral Disease Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Fort Detrick, Maryland); Gordon Chang; and General Robert Spalding.

(2) Plandemic 1 video and Transcript

Peter Myers, Sept 1, 2020

Plandemic 1 video is at https://qualityrags.net/video/aNjeT1G6iGTh%20(4).mp4?_=1

or visit her website: https://drjudyamikovits.com/

Transcript of Plandemic 1:

This transcript was produced by a Debunker site, ScienceMag. I deleted the ScienceMag 'fact-checking' rebuttals, just leaving the interview (and the introduction).

https://frankreport.com/2020/05/09/transcribed-the-banned-interview-with-dr-judy-Mikovits-claiming-dr-fauci-is-a-fraud-with-rebuttals-by-Science-magazine/

Frank Report | Investigative Journalism From Frank Parlato

Dr. Judy Mikovits. Her interview has been banned, which raises many questions in and of itself.

Transcribed: The Banned Interview With Dr. Judy Mikovits Claiming Dr. Fauci Is a Fraud ­ With Rebuttals By Science Magazine

May 9, 2020

The interview can still be viewed on Uge Tube:

It is called "Plandemic Documentary: The Hidden Agenda Behind Covid-19."

Marie White was good enough to transcribe it for us, in case the video disappears altogether.

SceinceMag.org has attempted to debunk the video, with an article entitled: Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video by Martin Enserink, Jon Cohen.

Science writes in part that Mikovits started as a lab technician at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 1988. She became a Ph.D. in biochemistry and molecular biology from George Washington University in 1991.

By 2009, she was research director at the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) in Reno, Nevada. She co-authored a paper in Science that suggested an obscure agent named xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) caused chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Other researchers questioned the findings. Two months later, the entire Science paper was retracted. But Mikovits refused to sign the retraction notice.

According to Science, following an additional study, Mikovits conceded, "There is no evidence that XMRV is a human pathogen." But she has later disputed this, saying that there is evidence.

Scienceıs news department published a detailed reconstruction of the fiasco in September 2011. Around the same time, Mikovits had a breakup with WPI. The institute filed suit against her in November 2011 for allegedly removing laboratory notebooks and keeping other proprietary information on her laptop, on flash drives, and in a personal email account. She was arrested in California on felony charges that she was a fugitive from justice and jailed for several days. Prosecutors in Washoe County, Nevada, eventually dropped criminal charges against her in June 2012.

Mikovits has not published anything in the scientific literature since 2012. But she soon began to promote the XMRV hypothesis again, and attack the Lipkin study that she agreed had put the issue to rest. She has weighed in on the autism debate with theories about causes and treatments.

She co-authored a book, Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science‹"a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will determine the future health of humanity"‹and the viral video, which is an interview with Mikovits.

So that said, here is the transcription of the video with Mikovits, with a few comments by ScienceMag.org [in bold and brackets]:

Mickey Willis, interviewer [I]:

Dr. Judy Mikovits has been called what is the most accomplished scientist of her generation.

I: Her 1991 doctoral thesis revolutionized the treatment of HIV/AIDS.

I: At the height of her career, Dr. Mikovits published a blockbuster article in the journal Science. The controversial article sent shock waves through the scientific community, as it revealed that the common use of animal and human fetal tissues was unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases.

I: For exposing their deadly secrets, the minions of Big Pharma waged war on Dr. Mikovits destroying her good name, career and personal life. Now, as the fate of nations hangs in the balance, Dr. Mikovits is naming names of those behind the plague of corruption that places all human life in danger.

So you made a discovery that conflicted with the agreed-upon narrative?

Mikovits: Correct

I: And for that, they did everything in their powers to destroy your life?

M: Correct

I: You were arrested

M: Correct.

I: And then put under a gag order?

M: For five years, if I went on social media, if I said anything at all, they would find new evidence, and put me back in jail and it was one of the few times I cried. It was because I knew there was no evidence the first time, and when you can unleash that kind of force, to force someone into bankruptcy with a perfect credit score and so that I couldnıt bring my 97 witnesses which included the heads, Tony Fauci, Ian Lipkins, the heads of the public health in HHS, who would have had to testify that we did absolutely nothing wrong.

I: And so what did they charge you with?

M: Nothing

I: But you were in jail?

M: I was held in jail with no charges.

M: I was called a fugitive from justice. No warrant, literally dragged me out of the house. Our neighbors are looking at whatıs going on here. You know, they searched my house without a warrant, literally terrorized my husband for five days. They said, if you donıt find the notebooks, if you donıt find the material, which was not in my possession, but planted in my house.

I: As if you took intellectual property from the laboratory, is that correct?

M: Yes. It was intended to appear as if I took confidential material, names, and intellectual property from the laboratory, and I could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I didnıt. Heads of our entire HHS [Department of Health and Human Services] colluded and destroyed my reputation and the Department of Justice and the FBI sat on it and kept that case under seal.

M: Which you canıt say thereıs a case or your lawyers are held in contempt of court. So you canıt even get a lawyer to defend you. So every single due process right was taken away from me, and to this day remains the same. I have no constitutional freedoms or rights.

I: Yet you sit here. I think a lot of people would probably have just taken the retirement, out early, laid low, but you have decided to come forth when your gag order has been released to write a book called, "Plague Of Corruption Restoring Faith In The Promise Of Science" and you are naming names.

M: Absolutely

I: Apparently their attempt to silence you has failed and I have to ask, how do you sit with confidence to call out these great forces and not fear for your life as you leave this building?

M: Because if we donıt stop this now, we can not only forget our republic and our freedom but we can forget humanity because we will be killed by this agenda.

I: So Anthony Fauci, the man who is heading the pandemic task force, was involved in a cover-up?

M: He directed the cover-up. And, in fact, everybody else was paid off, and paid off big-time, millions of dollars in funding from Tony Fauci, Tony Fauciıs organization, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. These investigators that committed the fraud, continue to this day to be paid big time by the NIAID.

I: And the whole world is listening to his advice for how to handle this current pandemic. How do we know that what he is saying is what we need to be learning?

M: What he is saying is absolute propaganda and the same kind of propaganda that heıs perpetrated to kill millions since 1984.

Clip of Dr. Fauci saying "We know from this study quite clearly that there will be a delay in progression significantly greater than for individuals who do not take the drug."

M: It started really when I was 25 years old, and I was part of the team that isolated HIV from the saliva and blood of the patients from France where [virologist] Luc Montagnier had originally isolated the virus.

This was a confirmatory study, but Tony Fauci and Robert Gallo were working together then to spin the story in a different way. At that time, Dr. [Francis] Ruscetti was out of town and Tony Fauci says, you know, we understand that you have a paper in press and we want a copy of it. And I said yes thereıs a paper in press, and itıs confidential and no I will not give you a copy of it.

He started screaming at me, then he said, "Give us the paper right now or youıll be fired for insubordination" and I just said, "Iım sure when Dr. Ruscetti gets back you can have the conversation". And so Frank (Ruscetti) comes back several weeks later and is really bullied into giving Fauci the paper.

Fauci holds up the publication of the paper for several months while Robert Gallo writes his own paper and takes all the credit and, of course, patents are involved. This delay of the confirmation, you know, literally led to spreading the virus around, you know, killing millions.

M: He called Dr Fauci "the Bernie Madoff of Science." Itıs still been crushing to me to think that I didnıt know my work in 1999 was something had been avoided. From 83 and 82, when the virus was isolated, the virus didnıt have to wait until 84 to be confirmed. Think of how many people, the entire continent of Africa, you know, lost a generation as that virus was spread through because of the arrogance of a group of people and it includes Robert Redfield, whoıs now the head of the CDC, right along with Tony Fauci. They were working together to take credit and make money and they had the patents on it and tailored them to IL2 therapy which was absolutely the wrong therapy and had that not happened, millions wouldnıt have died from HIV.

I: How can a man thatıs giving, any person who is giving global advice for health, own a patent in the solution, in the vaccine, isnıt that a conflict of interest or shouldnıt it be?

M: It is a conflict interest and in fact, this is one of the things that Iıve been saying, and would like to say to President Trump: Repeal the Bayh-Dole Act.

Unidentified Speaker: Bayh-Dole fundamentally changes the way that universities approach technology transfer. You can see that best in the statistics. Universities obtain 16 times as many patents today as they did in 1980. Now everybody is getting more patents but still universities share of all patents in the United States is more than five times greater than it was before Bayh-Dole. The situation has gotten so bad that one Information technology industry official has publicly referred the universities as quote "crack addicts" driven by quote "small-minded tech transfer offices addicted to patent royalties."

M: That act gave government workers the right to patent their discoveries. So to claim intellectual property for discoveries that the taxpayer paid for. Ever since that happened in the early 80s, it destroyed Science, and this allowed the development of those conflicts of interest and this is the crime behind letting somebody like Bill Gates, with billions of dollars. Nobody elected him. He has no medical background. He has no expertise, but we let people like that have a voice in this country while we destroy the lives of millions of people.

Bill Gates speaking: Normalcy only returns when weıve largely vaccinated the entire global population.

I: If we activate mandatory vaccines globally, I imagine these people stand to make hundreds of billions of dollars that own the vaccines.

M: And theyıll kill millions, as they already have with their vaccines. There is no vaccine currently on the schedule for any RNA virus that works.

I: So, I have to ask you, are you anti-vaccine?

M: Oh, absolutely not. In fact, vaccine is immune therapy, just like interferon alpha is immune therapy, so Iım not anti-vaccine. My job is to develop immune therapies. Thatıs what vaccines are.

I: Do you believe that this virus [SARS-CoV-2] was created in the laboratory?

M: I wouldnıt use the word created. But you canıt say naturally occurring if it was by way of the laboratory. So itıs very clear this virus was manipulated. This family of viruses was manipulated and studied in a laboratory where the animals were taken into the laboratory, and this is what was released, whether deliberate or not. That cannot be naturally occurring. Somebody didnıt go to a market, get a bat; the virus didnıt jump directly to humans. Thatıs not how it works. Thatıs accelerated viral evolution. If it was a natural occurrence, it would take up to 800 years to occur. This occurred from Sars 1 within a decade. Thatıs not naturally occurring.

I: And do you have any ideas of where this occurred?

M: Oh yeah, Iım sure it occurred between the North Carolina laboratories, Fort Detrick, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the Wuhan laboratory.

Clip speaker: $3.7 million flowed from the National Institutes of Health here in the US to the Wuhan lab in China, the same lab where many people have said that this coronavirus infection first originated. We also now know that NIAID, the department associated with the National Institutes of Health of which Anthony Fauci is in control, had already been conducting experiments with the Wuhan lab in the past in regard to coronavirus. If Dr. Anthony Fauci cannot be honest with the public about his connection to this lab, then Fauci has to go.

M: In 1999 I was working in Fort Detrick Š and my job was to teach Ebola how to infect human cells without killing them. Ebola couldnıt infect human cells until we took it in the laboratories and taught them.

I: Itıs hard to ignore the death tolls; people have been dying; they are dying from this and quite alarming numbers. How do you reconcile that?

M: Itıs pretty easy when you see, for me, when you see what the government has done and that is that they took quoting Dr. [Deborah] Birx "weıve taken a very liberal approach to mortality." If my husband were to die who has COPD his lungs have fibrosis his lungs would look exactly like somebody with COVID-19 theoretically, but he has no evidence of infection, so if youıre not testing and you donıt have evidence of infection and if you walked in there today, theyıd call it COVID-19 and we hear this from the doctors and nurses who are upset.

I: Iıve seen so many doctors online that have made their own webcam videos just perplexed by the protocol that the CDC had given them

Clip of a purported doctor talking [note I use the word "purported" since the doctors are not identified]: Well last Friday I received a seven-page document that sort of told me that if I had an 86 year-old patient that had pneumonia but was never tested for COVID-19 but sometime after she came down with pneumonia we learned that she had been exposed to her son who had no symptoms but later on was identified with COVID-19that it would be appropriate to diagnose on the death certificate COVID-19.

Another purported doctor: When Iım writing up my death report Iım being pressured to add COVID, why is that? Why are we being pressured to add COVID-19 to maybe increase the numbers and make it look a little bit worse than it is? I think so.

Another clip: Why would they want to skew the number of deaths for COVID-19?

Another purported doctor answers: Well fear is a great way to control people and sometimes peopleıs ability to think for themselves is paralyzed if theyıre frightened enough and thatıs not where I want people to be. I want people to be able to say weıre going to get through this. Iım going to use my head. Iım going to go to different sources and Iım going to think for myself, because thatıs what America is about.

Clip of Dr Deborah Birx: "If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death."

M: You donıt die with an infection, you die from an infection

I: Iıve talked with doctors who have admitted that they are being incentivized to list patients that are sick or have died with COVID-19.

M: Yea, 13,000 dollars from Medicare if you call it COVID-19.

A clip of a purported doctor: Right now Medicare is determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital youıll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000, three times as much.

M: And youıve killed them with the ventilator because you gave them the wrong treatment.

Another purported doctor: All the things that just donıt make sense. Patients Iım seeing in front of me, the lungs Iım trying to improve have led me to believe that weıre operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time.

I: My next question is about Italy. I want to know why Italy was hit so hard?

M: Italy has a very old population. Theyıre very sick with inflammatory disorders. They got, at the beginning of 2019, an untested new form of influenza vaccine that had four different strains of influenza, including the highly pathogenic H1N1. That vaccine was grown in a cell line, a dog cell line. Dogs have lots of coronaviruses and thatıs why theyıre not testing there you could just say oh it was that.

Clip from a report: As the country begins emerging from the worst of the corona epidemic one question remains: what happened to all the hydroxychloroquine?

A speaker: We know that hydroxychloroquine and zinc are working great for patients and then Fauci comes out and says, well thereıs no double-blind control placebo studies, which, by the way, Dr. Fauci, is there going to be a double-blind control placebo study of your vaccine, is there?

Another speaker: In a survey polling nearly 2300 doctors in some 30 countries, hydroxychloroquine was ranked as the most effective medication to treat the virus.

M: The AMA was saying doctors will lose their license if they use hydroxychloroquine, the anti-malarial drug thatıs been on the list of essential medicines worldwide for 70 years. Doctor Fauci calls that anecdotal data. Itıs not storytelling if we have thousands of pages of data saying itıs effective against these families of viruses. For 50 cents a dose, we can protect a thousand people Š with one six hundred dollar vial.

And this is essential medicine and they keep it from the people not only now, but back in autism, when our discovery there was an old antiviral drug, 100 year old drug called cerumen on the WHO list of essential medicine. You literally gave kids with autism a voice, a life and what did Bayer and Monsanto do? They took it away from everybody. You couldnıt get it to save your life right now, We tried, believe me, every way we could so when you take away a medicine and not just the WHO, the FDA, the CDC, Tony Fauci, close everything, just end it all and weıve got a healthy world again, and weıve got tons of money cuz we can take all that money that theyıre making on their patents and give it to the victims of this plague of corruption.

I: Is it safe to say that anything that cannot be patented has been shut down intentionally because there is no way to profit from it all these natural remedies that we have had forever?

M: Absolutely thatıs fair to say and thatıs exactly whatıs going on in COVID-19. The game is to prevent the therapies till everyone is infected and push the vaccines knowing that the flu vaccines increase the odds by 36% of getting COVID-19.

I: Where does that data come from?

M: A publication last year where the military who had been vaccinated with influenza were more susceptible to coronavirused. Coronavirus are in every animal so if you ever had a flu vaccine, you were injected with coronaviruses, and then to put on a mask

Another purported doctor: This doesnıt make any sense. We wear masks in an acute setting to protect us. Weıre not wearing masks. Why is that? Because we understand microbiology. We understand immunology and we want strong immune systems. Our immune system is used to touching. We share bacteria staphylococcal streptococcal bacteria viruses; we develop an immune response daily to this stuff.

When you take that away from me, my immune system drops. As I shelter-in-place my immune system drops. You keep me there for months, it drops some more. And now Iım at home, hand-washing vigorously, washing the counters, worried about things that are indeed what I need to survive.

Another purported doctor: Youıre not immune deficient, youıre not elderly. You should be able to go out without any gloves and without a mask. I think that if you are those things you should shelter in place or wear a mask and gloves. I donıt think everybody needs to wear a mask and gloves because it reduces your bacterial flora. It doesnıt allow you to interact with society and your bacterial flora in your viruses, your friends that protect you from other diseases, end up going away and now youıre more likely to get opportunistic infections, infections that are hoping you donıt have good bugs fighting for you, if that makes sense.

Another purported doctor: And then when we all come out of shelter in place with a lower immune system and start trading viruses and bacteria what do you think is going to happen? Disease is going to spike. Another purported doctor: I guarantee that when we reopen thereıs going to be a huge, huge amount of illness that is going to be rampant.

Another purported doctor: The building blocks of your immune system is virus and bacteria, end of story.

M: Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. Youıre getting sick from your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2, then youıve got a big problem.

I: Youıre not the first virologist who has told me weıre doing the exact opposite what we should be doing to contain and create immunity from this virus.

M: Why would you close the beach? Youıve got sequences in the soil, in the sand. Youıve got healing microbes in the ocean in the salt water. Thatıs insanity.

I These institutions that are polluting our environment and our bodies, there was a time when they had to fight their own battles but theyıve done such a great job at manipulating the masses that itıs other people shutting down other citizens, and the Big Tech platforms follow suit and they shut everything down. There is no dissenting voices allowed anymore in this "free" country, which is something I would never thought I would have lived to see.

M: Nor would I accept what Iıve experienced since 2011. Itıs beyond comprehension how a society can be so fooled that the types of propaganda continue to where theyıre just driving us to hate each other.

Clip of angry exchange: Woman: You want to go to work?

Man: Yes

Woman: And get this disease?

Man: Yes! Theyıve been wrong so far! Man, theyıve been wrong!

M: Hopefully this is the wake-up call of all America to realize this makes no sense and we win because it will take down the whole program with information like this, and for me, itıs the great news that the doctors are waking up and saying "wait a minute."

Another purported doctor: You, you doctors that are watching this I see a lot of you right here. Why are you not getting loud!? Iım here to defend you. Iım here to defend my freedoms. Iım here to defend my familyıs freedoms, my patients rights to choose what to do with their life! Iım just blown away and Iım blown away why there are not more doctors like me talking about this all over the place. We should be banding together right now. You need to wake up because your liberties are getting taken away from you all because of fake news thatıs out there. This is wrong! People should be going to jail for this stuff.

M: So itıs not scientists who are in anyway dishonest. Theyıre listening to people who for more than 40 years have controlled who gets funded, what gets published and Iım sorry to say many, many people will simply take the money and the fame and support things that are absolutely arenıt true.

I: What do you say to the medical professionals that are just beginning to get a glimpse of the depth to which they have been misled and steered away from their oath to do no harm.

M: I say to forgive yourselves. Itıs the hardest thing to realize for all of us is that with all the best intention we studied, we learned what we thought was the truth. We had no idea that that the data that we were being told was true, was not true. Weıve been taught now and our schools a very different Science. You donıt get funded, if you donıt speak the party line. You donıt get published. That was probably the hardest thing for me to take is understanding that scientific journals would twist the discovery that should have healed all.

Clip of Mikovits: Will the scientific community have the courage to answer the question of whether these diseases might have been of their own creation, thank you.

M: So what we did pretty much ever since Iıve got out of jail, we started an education company. We wake up doctors and itıs very difficult. But every doctor who realized they may have been part of the problem has now turned that around to march toward a better society and restore faith in the promise of medicine. Thatıs all we can do.

I: Dr. Markovits, thank you so much for your time. Itıs been a real honor to sit with you particularly thank you for your courage.

Dr Mikovits: Thank you, Mickey, I appreciate it a lot.

Clip of Dr Fauci

I: The idea that we are now a few days away from a new administration given as youıve heard from the introduction that I have been around for a while and have had the opportunity of serving in five administrations I thought I would bring that perspective to a topic today is the issue of pandemic preparedness, and if there is one message that I want to leave with you today is that there is no question that there will be a surprise outbreak. The thing that we are extraordinarily confident about and youıre going to see this in the next few years, thank you. ==

Follow-up interview with Dr Judy Mikovits: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jD8wpc76HUo9/

Here, she answers the objections and attacks in response to Plandemic 1.

(3) Tracking the Origin - Epoch Times interviews Judy Mikovits on the role of Wuhan Institute of Virology

Apart from Judy Mikovits, Joshua Phillip interviews a Chinese American, Dr Sean Lin, Former Lab Director of the Viral Disease Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Fort Detrick, Maryland.).

Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus

Apr 8, 2020

Video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R69lFCBa3HE

and at https://www.theepochtimes.com/coronavirusfilm

Transcript at https://www.organiser.org/Encyc/2020/4/22/Tracking-the-Origin-An-Epoch-Times-Investigation-.html

Tracking the Origin-An Epoch Times Investigation

Prashanth Vaidyaraj

Did China create the Coronavirus as biological weapon to destroy countries and economies? Was the theory of Coronavirus being originated from bats a flaseflag floated by China? Did China very well know the consequences and planned the same to take over countries, industries and sell its products after economies dither due to the virus? Investigation reveals all of these to be true.

It was suspected that the Coronavirus was an experiment in biological warfare that went out of hand. Several researchers and investigators had categorically stated way back in January that the pandemic was a result of the experiment at Wuhan Virology Laboratory that had either knowingly or unknowingly leaked to the outside world. Dany Shoham, a former Israeli military intelligence officer who studied Chinese biological warfare had directly charged that Coronavirus was a result of China's bio-warfare experiment.

Though it is not expected that Communist China would accept this, events that have transpired since then confirms many of these apprehensions. Look at the sequence of events:

China uses its contacts in WHO to delay the declaration of Coronavirus as a being contagious between humans
WHO delays declaration of the pandemic that originated in China
WHO terms closing for air traffic to and from China as an overreaction
Virus spreads to countries across the world and they shutdown
Economies founder as lockdown forces industries and businesses to close
China surprisingly 'recovers' and start selling medical equipment to control Corona
China tries to buy out sick industries and businesses in various countries
China forces world bodies and countries not to use the term 'Chinese Virus'

It is also true that the extent of the real number of deaths and infections in China is still unknown due to under-reporting of cases or control by the Communist party. However, a new path-breaking documentary sheds light on these aspects and reveals hitherto unknown facts about the origin of the virus which invariably points to the possibility of being artificially generated in a laboratory.

In the new documentary by The Epoch Times and NTD, Epoch Times investigative reporter Joshua Philipp takes an in-depth look at the progression of the pandemic from January to April and tracks the possible origins from Huanan Seafood Market in Hubei Province to the scandals at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, from long-running experiments on viruses to military takeovers, suspicious activities from other corners. This article is based on the documentary and the investigation of Joshua Philipp.

Joshua Philipp began looking into the origin of the now widely known coronavirus in early February with it's timing amid the Hong Kong protest, the Taiwan elections and the US-China trade deal. He investigated and wrote extensively about the Chinese Communist Party's programs of espionage and unconventional warfare for well over a decade. The videos and messages he used to receive from Chinese citizens leaked through the censorship suggested the situation was much worse than what the Communist regime was reporting. It was during his investigation and inputs from experts that he realised the allegation of the Chinese Communist Party that the Coronavirus started spontaneously in the Seafood Market in Wuhan was simply not true but propaganda to cover-up the truth.

Propagating story of bats at Seafood Market

China hurriedly closed the Huanan Seafood Market and cleaned up the premises in what seemed like destroying a crime scene even before investigation.

The first thing that received public attention about the epidemic was an internal notice from the Wuhan Health Commission. here has been a continuous occurrence of pneumonia cases of unknown cause.

The notice issued on December 30, 2019 clearly required all medical units to report similar cases of unknown pneumonia. The notice started spreading online on December 31st, 2019 the Wuhan Health Commission issued a public notice for the first time saying that some medical institutions found a link between the pneumonia cases and the Huanan Seafood Market. However, the notice pointed out that there was no evidence of obvious human-to-human transmission and no infection among medical personnel.

On January 1st, 2020 the Huanan Seafood Market posted a notice of closure. This was followed by a thorough cleanup of the market which seemed rushed. Guan Yi, a well known Hong Kong expert echoed my concern that the move was like destroying a crime scene. Since then, Wuhan officials have repeatedly said that most cases of pneumonia in Wuhan have a history of exposure to the Huanan Seafood Market.

On January 26, the Institute of Virology of China, CDC announced that 33 of the 585 environmental samples from the Huanan Seafood Market were found to contain the novel coronavirus nucleic acid and the virus was successfully isolated from the positive culture samples suggesting that the virus originated from wild animals sold at the market. At this point, Huanan Seafood Market being the source of the epidemic became an official conclusion.

A few days later however, a report from the Journal Science published online challenged that story. The report cited a paper in The Lancet, one of the world's top medical journals and questioned whether Wuhan's novel coronavirus pneumonia could not have originated at the market. The paper titled, Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China was published in The Lancet on January 24. The first author of the paper is Huang Chaolin, Deputy Director of Jin Yin-tan Hospital, the first designated hospital for treatment of unknown pneumonia in Wuhan. This journal article is very important as it reveals a lot of important information.

The Lancet Papers exposes China's game

Lancet Papers show that supposed patient zero was nowhere near the market and that there are no bats in the Seafood Market or anywhere close.

The paper talks about the first patient onset was actually on December 1st and these patients were not related to Huanan Seafood Market. Dr Sean Lin, Former Lab Director of the Viral Disease Branch Walter Reed Army Institute of Research says there was no epidemiological association found between the first patient and subsequent patient and they had no contact with the Huanan Seafood Market. He also said that about December 10th there was three more onset cases out of which two were not related to Huanan Seafood Market. A major discovery in this paper was it mentions that when there were a total of 41 patients, 14 of them proved to be unrelated to the Seafood Market, accounting for more than one third of the patients.

Moreoever, it was revealed that no one sells bats at the Seafood Market and the officials from CDC didn't mention they found any bats in the Seafood Market too. Judy A Mikovits, Molecular Biologist and Former Director of Lab of AntiViral Mechanisms NCI, says that the Lancet Papers show that supposed patient zero was nowhere near the market. Secondly, she says that there are no bats in the Seafood Market or anywhere close, and the idea of the spread so fast through a population just the way it was said through the Seafood Market is highly unlikely and improbable.

On January 29th, The Lancet republished an analysis of 99 confirmed cases at Jin Yin-tan Hospital of which 50 had no history of exposure to the Seafood Market. According to the New England Journal, of the 425 cases confirmed before Jan. 22nd, 45 cases onset before January 1st had no history of exposure to the Seafood Market. Notably, the authors of the two Lancet papers in the New England Journal of Medicine are doctors and medical experts in mainland China.

Daniel Lucey, an epidemiologist at the University of Georgetown has said in response to The Lancet Paper that if the data were accurate, the first case would have been infected by the virus already in November, 2019 because of the incubation period between infection and symptoms. This would mean that the virus was quietly spreading between people in some parts of Wuhan before the cluster of cases with a history of exposure to the Huanan Seafood Market began on December 15. The first expert group from the National Health Commission arrived in Wuhan as early as December 31st, 2019. The expert panel established a set of diagnostic criteria after investigating Jin Yin-tan Hospital of Wuhan that stipulated a history of contact with Huanan Seafood Market, the person having a fever and displaying the whole genome sequence. All three standards have to be met to confirm a case. This standard was used until a second group of experts, including Zhong Nanshan, arrived in Wuhan on January 18th and made a revision.

Why then did the panel impose a history of Seafood Market exposure as a criteria of diagnosis knowing that at least a third of the cases were unrelated to the Seafood Market? They clearly knew about 14 patients not related to Huanan Seafood Market at all, so that clearly means there was another source of outbreak. Joshua thinks this somehow this could be a malfeasance or somewhat intentional cover-up some important source of infection. It can go a long way to covering up the actual source by imposing a false place and you're not looking at the actual victims, then you're only allowed to find your keys under the light post.

The numbers that we're getting from China about new infections and deaths are highly suspicious. We know that Beijing for six weeks in December, in January, suppressed information of the epidemic and then when they officially acknowledged it on January 20 they then started a campaign of suppression of information. We know that because the central leading group that was announced on January 26 has a nine person roster and it's very heavy with propaganda officials. Indeed, the vice chairman of the group is the Communist Party's propaganda czar. It appears that the Party's main goal here is suppression of information, controlling the narrative. That's more important to them than actually ending the epidemic.

The Mysterious Gene Sequence

The amino acid similarity of COVID19 gene sequence with SARS is a possibility that the virus could be generated through a reverse engineered process.

On January 10th, China disclosed the full genome sequence of the Wuhan novel coronavirus, and many of the world's top virologists began analyzing it. As early as January 7th, an academic, Zhang Yongzhen, from the National Institute of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, along with the School of Public Health of Fudan University, submitted a joint paper to Nature. The paper was published on February 3rd and pointed out that the Wuhan coronavirus is closely related to CoVZC45 and CoVZXC21, two viruses sampled from bats in Zhoushan by the People's Liberation Army. The Wuhan coronavirus has an 89.1% nucleotide similarity to the CoVZC45 virus, and even exhibits 100% amino acid similarity in the NSP7 and E proteins.

Shortly after the paper was published, other scientists used Blast, a program developed by the National Institute of Health and the National Center for Biotechnology Information to compare the viral sequence based on the data submitted by Chinese authorities on January 12th. The results matched with Zhang's findings. Another scientist, Lu Roujian, from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and their team also published a paper in The Lancet on January 30. The paper stated that the Wuhan virus has an 88% similarity to two bat-derived SARS-like coronaviruses collected in Zhoushan, Zhejiang province of China. The earliest discovery of this bat-derived virus is by an expert from the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command.

A paper published in 2018 states that scientists from this institute detected many SARS-like coronaviruses in bats from Zhoushan City, also known as bat SARS-like coronavirus, Zhoushan virus. In short, scientists found the Wuhan coronavirus, the current pandemic, is highly similar to a bat SARS-like coronavirus previously discovered by the Nanjing Military Research Institute, showing 100% amino acid similarity in NSP7 and envelope protein, the E protein.

What does this high similarity reveal? Experts believe it is hard to see a protein that is 100% identical when the virus jumps species. Hence it is a possibility that the virus could be generated through a reverse engineered process. Joshua Philipp says that he believes that a 100% amino acid similarity says it can't possibly be a natural mutation. It almost certainly is a recombination event that was laboratory driven.

{13:00} On January 21st, researchers from the Institute Pasteur, Shanghai Chinese Academy of Sciences published a paper in Science China Life Sciences that mentioned an important phenomenon. The sequence of a key part of S protein of Wuhan virus has high homology with the SARS virus.

What are S proteins? In the well-known coronavirus picture, they're little mushrooms attached to the surface of the virus. These S proteins, also known as spine proteins or spike proteins, are the most important tool for the coronavirus to invade human cells. If we compare the receptor ACE2 on the cell surface of human bodies to a lock, this S protein is the key which can unlock this lock on the cell surface and then invade into the cell to propagate and destroy it. That means virus now can infect human cell much easier and that's probably also one of the important reason the contributing to multi-organ failure when people have a very severe disease. They can spread out in the human body much faster. The high similarity of the S proteins from SARS1 to now SARS2, that's your spike protein. That's the lock and key. That's going to be what drives it right through human cells.

14:25 JudyM: And so we know that's the pathogenic spike protein for the original SARS. So now you're allowing that access to human tissues because the spike proteins of the natural evolutionary strains don't infect human cells at all. So that research has been going on at Wuhan and published since 2007. And clearly if that spike protein from SARS weren't on the new COVID-19 or SARS2, it wouldn't be able to enter human cells. So again, this is again evidence that it couldn't go through the Wuhan Seafood Market because how did you get that spike protein off the original SARS from bats or any other way. It's lab derived.

JP: Research into the virus genome sequence revealed many essential data points. According to a February 28 report in the South China Morning Post, the Shanghai P3 Laboratory, which first shared the Wuhan coronavirus genome with the world, was ordered to close by authorities, impeding further research on the virus.

Professor Zhang Yongzhen and his team, who published the genome sequence on January 11th, worked at this laboratory. According to a February 26 report on Caixin, Zhang Yongzhen's team isolated and completed the genome sequence of the previously unknown virus on January 5th. On the same day, the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center reported the discovery to the National Health Commission and recommended prevention measures. No response was received as of January 11th. And it was then the team decided to publicize the virus genome sequence on virological.org, becoming the first team to do so in the world.

The Shanghai P3 Laboratory, which first shared the Wuhan coronavirus genome with the world, was ordered to close by Chinese authorities, impeding further research on the virus

Caixin also reported that the Hubei Health Committee had already notified genome sequencing organizations on January 1st regarding the cessation of analysis of Wuhan virus samples. Existing virus samples must be destroyed. Information on the samples related to papers and related data are all prohibited from release.

On January 3rd China's National Health Commission distributed Notification Letter 2020 No.3 in which a similar directive was presented. Afterwards, the once active Chinese scientific community suddenly fell into an eerie silence. Dr Sean Lin questions, "What was the Chinese Communist Party trying to hide? This is telling us the Chinese government is censoring this information. They do not allow the samples to be sequenced or do not allow the sequence to be published or submitted to gene bank."

Gordon Chang, Columnist and Asian Affairs Expert says, "Chinese response to this virus is extremely troubling. It ignored it for six weeks then allowed it to spread around China. It tried to get other countries to not protect themselves. This is dangerous, irresponsible behavior which endangered not only the Chinese people, but people around the world."

Gen. Robert Spalding, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institue and Former NSC Senior Strategy Director, says "There is no other way of looking at it, they are responsible for the continuation of this coronavirus and every time it comes back, because it will come back because it's going to be with us now permanently. It will come back and every person that it kills, every person it harms is directly attributable to the Chinese Communist Party."

In June 2010, a team of Chinese scientists had demonstrated their awareness of the special relationship between the SARS and Corona Virus which showed that they knew that coronaviruses could infect human bodies.

Through investigating the genome sequence, Joshua Philipp found that the S protein of the Wuhan coronavirus was critical in its cross-species ability to infect humans. While he searched for related studies online, one Chinese virologist in particular caught his attention. She had spent many years researching bats and coronaviruses. She was the first to locate the key to how coronaviruses can overcome cross species barriers, in order to directly infect human bodies, and she was the first to discover that the SARS virus was the result of a restructuring of multiple SARS like coronaviruses found in bats. Her name is Shi Zhengli, and she may be an important link to the origin of the virus.

Caixin, a media company with ties to the Chinese Communist Party, interviewed Shi Zhengli, in an attempt to refute these rumors. Dr. Sean Lin says Dr. Zhengli Shi is one of the top experts in China, studying about coronavirus, in Wuhan Institute of Virology. "She has so many publications from collecting identify bat coronavirus from bat caves. Her lab had these capacities and very sophisticated capacity to generate mutations to make it best for human expression as well", says Dr. Sean.

Delving further into related information, Joshua discovered that Shi Zhengli published not one, but four papers in total. Each of which contained important information.

Since the SARS outbreak in 2003, Shi Zhengli has been conducting research on coronaviruses. From 2010 onward, the focus of Shi and her team, was redirected to identifying the capacity for coronavirus transmission across species, specifically putting the spotlight on the S protein of the coronaviruses. In other words, her team's research in the Wuhan lab, has been looking into the part that can make coronaviruses transmittable to humans. I

In June, 2010, a team including Shi Zhengli, published a paper which described research to understand the susceptibility of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 ACE-2 proteins, of different bat species to the S protein of the SARS virus. In the experiments, they also modified key amino acid codons to mutate the bats ACE-2 to examine compatibility with the SARS S protein. This paper demonstrated their awareness of the special relationship between the S protein and the ACE-2 receptor. It also signified that Shi had unearthed the passageway for coronaviruses into human bodies.

In October, 2013, Shi and her team published a paper in the authoritative science journal, Nature. They claimed a breakthrough in coronavirus research. What was their breakthrough? They successfully isolated three viruses from bats, one of which had a S protein that integrated with human ACE-2 receptors. This effectively demonstrated the direct human infection of SARS-like viruses to humans, without the need of an intermediate host. Then in November, 2015, Shi and her team at the Wuhan lab once again published a paper. This time in the British journal, Nature Medicine. They discussed the creation of a synthetic virus, a self-replicating Chimeric virus. This virus had the SARS virus as the framework, with the key S protein replaced, by the one they had found in a bat coronavirus, she mentioned in her 2013 paper.

{That 2015 research was conducted under Ralph Baric of UNC - he was the lead author of the paper; Shi Zhengli and Xing-Yi Ge from WIV were participants, and supplied the bat samples. Joshua Phillips mentions Baric's role later in the video - Peter M.}

"Additional studies very strongly support the idea that this new coronavirus came from a recombination event, that is a cutting and pasting of two different viruses" - Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from George Washington University

This new virus demonstrated a powerful ability for cross-species infection. The mice infected with the synthetic virus revealed severe lung damage with no cure. This symbolized that Shi's successful splicing of the SARS virus, was a key to open the door to the cross-species transmission. What is startling is that the successful experiments on mice were only the tip of the iceberg. They planned to further experiment on primates, although Shi Zhengli did not indicate any conclusion from this research. Her move to research on primates suggests this was to more closely simulate the infection of humans, with this new synthetic virus.

However, Shi's experiments quickly triggered widespread debates from the academic community. Simon Wain-Hobson of the Pasteur Institute in France, expressed deep concerns. He told Nature, if the new virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory. Dr Judy Mikovits says propagation could happen anywhere. "Simon Wain-Hobson's prediction is exactly what's happening, that the virus is everywhere, and it could not spread that fast through various countries, unless it's been spread via laboratories, via the mail, via research scientists studying that", Dr Judy.

On November 14, 2018, Shi Zhengli spoke at the School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The topic was, Bat coronavirus and its cross species infection. Reports of this event have since been deleted from the University website. Joshua discovered two more significant pieces of information regarding the dangers of the research conducted by Shi Zhengli's team.

First, on October 16, 2014, the Obama administration, wary of the potential threats to public health from the Gain-of-function, GoF research into SARS, MERS, influenza, announced through the National Institute of Health, that it was suspending funding into similar research. The funding pause included Shi Zhengli's research project, genetic engineering of SARS-like coronavirus in bats, a collaborative effort with Dr Ralph Baric, a virologist at the University of North Carolina.

Second, after the Wuhan outbreak, Indian researchers compared the S protein sequence between 2019-nCoV (Wuhan coronavirus) and SARS. They discovered that 2019-nCoV (Wuhan coronavirus) had four new sequences inserted, all of which can be found in HIV sequences, through a search on GenBank. Shi Zhengli discredited those observations, although she never denied the existence of the four inserted sequences.

"The research that they actually published shows that Dr. Shi and her team working on developing a coronavirus for the human host" - Gen. Robert Spalding, Senior Fellow, Hudson Institue and Former NSC Senior Strategy Director

However, scientists probing GenBank, found that there were only three viruses containing all sequences. The first is the HIV virus itself. The second is a bat coronavirus discovered by Shi, and the third is this Wuhan coronavirus.

{the second would be RaTG13. But Nerd asks: if RaTG13 is a natural virus discovered in 2013, why did Shi Zhengli not report it until Jan 23, 2020? He says that Shi has no physical copy of that virus, and suggests that she faked it <https://nerdhaspower.weebly.com/RaTG13-is-fake.html>. Professor Edward Holmes, an evolutionary virologist at the University of Sydney, wrote, "(i) RaTG13 was sampled from a different province of China (Yunnan) to where COVID-19 first appeared; and (ii) the level of genome sequence divergence between SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 is equivalent to an average of 50 years (and at least 20 years) of evolutionary change. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 was not derived from RaTG13. <https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/04/16/COVID-19-statement-professor-edward-Holmes-sars-cov-2-virus.html> - Peter M.}

"We have done this work for 40 years. There is a sequence analysis and comparison of the virus of the SARS2 to COVID-19, apparently has genes that come from other human and other species including some envelope, the gp41 from HIV", informs Dr. Judy.

So, what is the HIV's gp41? Online sources describes gp41 as a protein of HIV that acts as the key to infecting human bodies, resulting in the functional failure of the immune system. If the discovery by Judy and her colleagues are established, it would mean that the infectious part of the Wuhan virus, the S protein, incorporated the sequence of the HIV key protein. This made Joshua think of the immunodeficiency symptoms in people infected.

Gen. Robert Spalding alleges, "They were doing research on a human transmittable Coronavirus that was actually published in a paper. The research that they actually published shows that Dr. Shi and her team working on developing a coronavirus for the human host. This leads to the question, why would anyone be creating a coronavirus that can infect humans? What would be the purpose of that research? Is it for a weapon? Is it so that you can then create a vaccine that you are the sole recipient of the profits from?".

He further says, "The Chinese have full access to our databases. They have full access to all that research that comes out. They have full access to all our universities that train their scientists, and they have full access to our scientists. This was proved with the recent indictment of the Head of the Chemistry Department at Harvard. I mean this is the Thousand Talents Program, tens of thousands of the world's most brightest people, in all of these different areas, that are going to China to help them with their programs. And all of these programs, as you know, have a dual use capability."

The Secret Wuhan P4 Laboratory and China's war to dominate the world

The Coronavirus outbreak occurred in Wuhan, the same location as the P4 laboratory where Shi Zhengli and her team were based and which housed highly similar viruses.

January 23rd, 2020. The Wuhan virus exploded. While Wuhan announced the lockdown of the city, Shi Zhengli and her team released a paper stating that the Wuhan coronavirus was of probable bat origin. This was published in Nature on February 3rd. The paper indicated that the Wuhan virus utilized the same key as SARS to gain entry into the human body. She also announced the 2019-nCoV genome sequence was 96.2% consistent with a bat coronavirus originating in Yunnan, China, called RaTG13, signaling a natural source of the Wuhan virus. However, Shi Zhengli's natural origin assertion was doubtful. The outbreak occurred in Wuhan, the same location as the P4 laboratory where she was based and which housed highly similar viruses. Common sense would lead the government to first inspect the P4 laboratory for any leakage incident and potential safety concerns. Instead, they shifted public attension from the P4 laboratory to the Huanan Seafood Market that sold no bats and designated it as the origin of the disease.

At the same time, authorities sealed off all virus samples, prevented international experts from joining the investigation, and used national television to slander doctors such as Li Wenliang who disclosed the outbreak, for spreading rumors. If the Wuhan virus indeed emerged naturally, why would the CCP need to censor relevant news or block investigations? Could the Wuhan P4 laboratory have its secrets? Virus samples and genome sequences may be the exact ingredients we need to find our answers.

Gordon Chang say, "When I first heard of the coronavirus, I was deeply concerned. Almost every disease that starts in China begins in Guangdong province, the province that surrounds Hong Kong in the south, but Wuhan is in the central portion of the country and so this was extremely unusual. And the fact that it might've started close to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the P4 bio safety lab, really was extremely troubling. It's not a conspiracy theory to think that the coronavirus came from the Wuhan lab. We don't know at this point. And until we know, the theory about the lab origin is certainly something that we should consider."

Joshua noticed that after the outbreak, the Wuhan Institute of Virology kept strangely quiet. Under normal circumstances, as the nation's highest level of Virology Research Institute, it should be the first one to actively respond when the entire country is working around the clock attempting to control a disease like this. One that so closely fits the type of viruses its scientists were researching. In contrast, the Institute had a highly visible demonstration on CCTV of their efforts to detect and prevent the outbreak of virus in pigs of Guangdong in 2018. It should be noted that the Wuhan Institute displayed a series of abnormal events since the start of 2020.

January 2nd, an email from the Director-General of the Institute to all internal staff was circulated. The subject was "Notice regarding the strict prohibition of disclosure of any information related to the Wuhan unknown pneumonia." National Health Commission clearly mandates that all detection, empirical data, results, and conclusions related to this outbreak cannot be published on self-media or social media, nor disclosed to any media including state media or collaborative organizations, including any technical services companies. January 21st, a new drug, Remdesivir, provided for free by the United States to China for Wuhan coronavirus treatment was preemptively patented by the institute.

February 3rd, Dr. Wu Xiaohua blew the whistle using his real name, that Shi Zhengli's haphazard laboratory management may have led the Wuhan virus to leak from the lab.

February 4th, Chairman of Duoyi, Xu Bo, blew the whistle using his real name, that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was suspected of manufacturing and leaking the Wuhan virus.

February 7th, top biochemical weapon expert of the People's Liberation Army, Chen Wei, officially assumed control over Wuhan Institute of virology's P4 laboratory.

February 14th, Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, called for the inclusion of bio security into China's national security framework and to accelerate the introduction of a bio security law.

{photo} Chinese Doctor Li Wenliang who died of Wuhan Virus had warned fellow medics in December but police told him to stop "making false comments"

February 15th, the institute refuted widely spread rumors on Chinese social media that a female graduate, Huang Yanling was patient zero and had perished. However, Huang's photo, CV and thesis were all removed from the Institute's official website, leaving only her name.

February 17th, institute researcher Chen Quanjiao blew the whistle using her real name, that Director General of the institute, Wang Yanyi was suspected of leaking the virus.

Chinese authorities sealed off all virus samples, prevented international experts from joining the investigation, and used national television to slander doctors such as Li Wenliang who disclosed the outbreak.

Judy Mikovits says after she graduated from the university of Virginia in 1980 her first job was to go to the National Cancer Institute, which was housed at Fort Detrick, Maryland, the same place that houses the USAMRIID US Army Research Institute on Infectious Disease, the bio safety level 4 facility equivalent of the Wuhan facility. "At these facilities, it's where investigators who, I went in there myself, you can see the breakdowns in safety and it's everywhere. That's why I have no doubt the Chinese bio safety level 4 was just as lacking in safety, in rigor. You can argue that they don't care", says Judy.

If a laboratory is suspected of leaking the virus, military biochemical weapons expert assumes control under bio-security laws. This shows that the P4 laboratory is not an ordinary academic research institute. Joshua then decided to start from the beginning of the Wuhan P4 lab.

On January 23rd, the day Wuhan was locked down, French website challenges.fr published an article that revealed many details of the collaboration between France and China to establish the P4 laboratory in Wuhan. In 2003, after the SARS outbreak in China, the Chinese Academy of Sciences requested assistance from the French government to build the Virology Research Center of the highest level. With the support of then French Prime Minister, Raffarin, the two countries signed a contract to jointly construct the P4 laboratory, under a wave of contention.

According to the contract, French architect RTV in Lyon was responsible for the engineering of the laboratory. However, Chinese authorities switched the work to a local Wuhan architect IPPR. Based on research conducted by the General Directorate of External Security, IPPR had close ties to subsidies of the Chinese military, some of which were already targets of concern by the American CIA. Within the 12 subsidiary departments, there was even a specific Military Management Office.

The French delayed repeatedly, given security concerns. It wasn't until 2017 before the Wuhan P4 laboratory was operational and French security continued to suspect that the Chinese regime was conducting biochemical weapons experiments.

Who is the real boss of the P4 laboratory? The Wuhan P4 laboratory was a subsidiary of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is managed by China Academy of Sciences. The director of the laboratory was Yuan Zhiming who was also the head of Chinese Academy of Sciences' Wuhan chapter. Design and funding for construction were the responsibilities of the ex-Vice Presidents of the Academy, Jiang Mianheng from 1999 to 2011 and Chen Zhu from 2000 to 2007. Jiang Mianheng was the eldest son of ex-CCP leader, Jiang Zemin. After Jiang Zemin ascended to power after the Tiananmen Square massacre, his son entered the Academy and led the Institute of High Technologies Research and Development.

Jiang Mianheng created the Shanghai Institute of Life Sciences and together with China Academy of Sciences, Shanghai colleges and universities, Shanghai hospitals, military hospitals, and research institutions, formed a profit group of life sciences organizations. They controlled China's major life sciences research projects and allocation of massive funding. Jiang Zhicheng, son of Jiang Mianheng, is the controlling shareholder of WuXi AppTech, which in turn is controlling Fosun Pharmaceutical, China's agent for Remdesivir. Effectively, Jiang Zhicheng is the kingpin behind the specific medicine for the outbreak. Meanwhile, Chen Zhu is the current president of the Red Cross Society of China, which had faced numerous scandals since the outbreak.

In 1999, while Jiang Zemin was in power, the People's Liberation Army published a book, 'Unrestricted Warfare', in which strategies for a weaker nation to combat a stronger nation are discussed in the context of modern warfare. One of the authors, Qiao Liang wrote, after the first Taiwan Strait crisis, we realized that if the Chinese and American military fought head on, we are at a disadvantage. Therefore, we need a new strategy to help our military tilt the balance of power. This new strategy is called 'Unrestricted Warfare', a variety of means beyond all limits, without any restrictions. It could be military related, including guerrilla warfare, terrorism, biochemical warfare, or it could be non-military related such as drug trafficking, poisoning, environmental destruction and computer virus dissemination.

Israeli expert in biological warfare and former intelligence officer, Dany Shoham published a paper in 2015 in India's Journal of Defense Studies. He pointed out that China will not miss, skip, or abandon any highly advanced technology, especially military related technology. The article noted that China had 12 facilities related to the Ministry of National Defense and 30 subsidiary facilities of the PLA, participating in the research, development, manufacturing, testing or storage of biological weapons.

Dr. Francis Boyle, a Harvard PhD, famous for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, clearly expressed, the novel coronavirus we're seeing here is an offensive biological warfare weapon.

The Federation of American Scientists indicated similar concerns in an evaluation report. The organization believed that the CCP possessed advanced chemical warfare projects, including research, development, manufacturing, and weaponizing capabilities. The CCP is usually known to have a proactive biological warfare portfolio, including state funded and sponsored research activities.

Anothy Shaffer, Former CIA Trained Intelligence Officer says, "So Wuhan, as an area, I think is critical by the fact that there's a lot of concern about what China's ambitions are regarding long term global domination. I can say that their military doctrines indicated that they intend to be the dominant political and military force to Pacific Rim. I've talked to senior members of the Trump administration who had conversations with the senior Chinese generals and that's what they basically said. It's in their doctrine too. So we have to examine this new clue. So this Wuhan biological warfare is one piece of the puzzle. Does this mean something to these other things we're already seeing? Because the Chinese have already kind of stated this is their objective. So I think we have to analyze it through that lens. What does this mean to the larger political narrative of what China wants to do to dominate the region and potentially the world?"

Gordon Chang says that US doesn't have to speculate about being at war. "Last May, the communist party, through People's Daily, carried a piece which said that there was a "people's war" against the United States. They've declared war on us. We have to respond. There is a war. China's told us there's one."

Facing The Chinese Communist Virus

Experts say that a aggressive disinformation campaign has been unleashed globally by the Chinese communist party which aims to deflect blame over the Chinese regime's botched handling of the Wuhan Coronavirus.

At present the Wuhan Coronavirus pandemic has spread to about 180 countries with no signs of slowing down. The United States announced a state of national emergency. Europe became the new center of the outbreak. The world's largest art museum, the Louvre, and the Eiffel Tower closed to the public. Tragic scenes, previously only found in Hollywood films, are now playing out live on the world stage. And given how closely it seemed to align with the Chinese regime's narratives, one can't help but question the role the WHO had in this catastrophic pandemic.

Columnist Gordon Chang says from the very beginning of the Coronavirus outbreak, the communist party has done its best to prevent the CDC and others from studying the origin of this disease. "We don't know what's there, but the fact that the communist party is covering this up, it should trouble us deeply.

Investigative author James Grundvig says, "You see the World Health Organization take over YouTube and what's amazing is now at the bottom of every YouTube video, even from Chris Martenson with his daily updates, I think it's just reading facts. Now it's the World Health Organization is a forced link to go to their site. So for any person who doesn't know who the World Health Organization is, they go there to get the propaganda, not the facts, not the truth. They get the propaganda. They get the talking points from the World Health Organization."

Alleging that even big Social Media companies have fallen prey to the propaganda, James Grundvig says, "It's a shame that American corporations, especially social media like Google, like Facebook and Twitter, they're trying to sensor, or ban, or shadow ban, or manipulate algorithms, so on and so forth to prevent an actual honest conversation. The best way this is going to be answered, all this, we want the truth."

Judy Mikovits says the biggest issue she has learned over her 40 year career is it's not really fighting the viruses and learning how to treat the viruses but fighting a system that is determined to cover up and persecute anyone who reveals the truth behind. [...]

END

(4) Plandemic 2 (Plandemic, Part 2); CDC and Ralp Baric (UNC) hold patents on Coronavirus

Plandemic II: Indoctornation

download: https://wetransfer.com/downloads/849238c82016384cb75bf12d1162f1a220200819171452/1fd905

watch (BitChute ): https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/

First published at 18:25 UTC on August 18th, 2020. DOWNLOAD AND SHARE : https://we.tl/t-zaQKHTYOez (2G)

Download higher res : https://we.tl/t-Qprj584UrR (5G)

Visit our website: https://www.plandemicseries.com

The presentation is mostly by Dr. David E. Martin. Judy Mikovits appears only briefly, at the start; but it takes up issues she raised in Plandemic 1.

No transcript has been published, but Dr Joseph Mercola's analysis is a good summary. Below is just some extracts; get the rest at the link.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/08/25/plandemic-indoctornation.aspx

Plandemic, Part 2

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola - August 25, 2020 (2363 words)

"Plandemic II ‹ Indoctornation" reveals the driving forces behind the vaccine agenda. It looks at the roles of the World Health Organization, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanom, Dr. Anthony Fauci, mainstream media, Silicon Valley tech giants, Big Pharma and many others, connecting the dots between them. The not-for-profit documentary can be viewed at plandemicseries.com.

The U.S. CDC owns the patent for SARS-CoV (the virus responsible for SARS) isolated from humans. In 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their coronavirus patent confidential. They also own patents for detection methods, and for a kit to measure the virus

By law, one cannot patent naturally-occurring DNA. If SARS-CoV is natural, then the patent is illegal. If the virus is manmade, the patent is legal, but the creation of the virus would be a violation of biological weapons treaties and laws. So, either way, the CDC has engaged in illegal activity

Because the CDC owns the patent on SARS-CoV, it controls who has the ability to make inquiries into it. Unless authorized, you cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it or make tests for it, since they own all those patents. This means the CDC has a major profit motive

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill owns a patent describing methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses. [...]

Dangerous Gain-of-Function Research Was Permitted

Martin goes on to describe events occurring between 2012 and 2013. At that time, the National Institutes of Health decided to take another look at gain-of-function research, ultimately deciding that gain-of-function research on coronavirus was too risky to continue.

This led to the suspension of funding of such research in 2013. That included funding flowing into Harvard, Emery and University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. However, while the NIH had moral and even legal reasons for suspending such research, they made the funding pause voluntary, not mandatory.

Then, in 2014, when the push-back against gain-of-function research into coronaviruses grew further, the NIH ‹ under the leadership of Fauci ‹ offshored that research to ‹ you guessed it ‹ the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

However, as detailed by Martin, the funding was not sent in a straight-forward way. Instead, it was funneled through front organizations such as the EcoHealth Alliance, led by its president, Peter Daszak, whose research, according to the EchoHealth Alliance website, "includes identifying the bat origin of SARS."7

Between 2014 and 2019, EcoHealth Alliance received a long list of grants from the NIH to study "the risk of bat coronavirus emergence." EcoHealth Alliance then subcontracted that work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. So, in the end, the U.S. could deny culpability, blaming the outbreak on China when, in fact, it was American research that had been outsourced.

Interestingly, in late-breaking news August 19, 2020, The Wall Street Journal8 reported that the NIH had notified EcoHealth that it wants "a sample of the new coronavirus that the Wuhan researchers used to determine its genetic sequence," along with study details and other information.

Additionally, the NIH demanded that EcoHealth "arrange for an inspection of the Wuhan Institute of Virology by an outside team that would examine the facilityıs lab and records Œwith specific attention to addressing the question of whether WIV staff had SARS-CoV-2 in their possession prior to December 2019.ı"

The problem, Martin notes in "Indoctornation," is that while the evidence is staring us right in the face, weıre told that so-called "fact-checkers" have a transcendent view of the situation, and they are the ultimate arbiters of truth. As a result, we have this very strange situation where facts and logic are being steamrolled and lambasted as good old-fashioned heresy. [...]

Yet, we must face it because itıs not going away or resolving in the near future. It is important to understand that we are all being subjected to a massive propaganda campaign to move us toward a very specific technocratic agenda. It is only by seeking alternative views that we can begin to understand the truth.

In the case of coronavirus, it should be clear that gain-of-function research is a dangerous game that should not be permitted. By giving researchers the go-ahead to continue this kind of research, even as the NIH publicly "paused" funding for it, the NIH failed to uphold its moral and legal responsibilities.

(5) Chinese patents for coronavirus S gene (2004), and S protein of coronavirus SARS-CoV (2005)

David E. Martin notes that CDC owns the patent for SARS-CoV. He covers other patents owned by the University of North Carolina, but may not have been aware that Chinese scientists also filed Patents on Coronavirus

Chinese patent for coronavirus S gene (2004)

https://patents.google.com/patent/CN1276777C/en?q=pshuttle-SN&oq=pshuttle-SN

SARS vaccine of adenovirus vector and preparation method, application of coronavirus S gene

Application number CN 200410044285

Filing date 2004-05-18 Publication date 2006-09-27

Abstract

translated from Chinese

The present invention belongs to the field of genetic engineering, particularly relates to adenoviral vector SARS vaccines, their preparation and coronavirus S genes in SARS (SARS) on vaccines for the prophylaxis. By means of biological engineering, the coronavirus S gene in combination with deficient recombinant adenovirus, the protective immunogen protein or polypeptide expressed therein, through expansion culture, purification, and formulation to prepare a mucosal immunogenicity can cause the gene vaccine, respiratory mucosal immune response induced by the body to produce antibodies against the virus infection. Specific conditions of the present invention, compared with conventional inactivated virus particle vaccine, safe, easy to use, without limitation intramuscular, have broad clinical applications.

III. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first object of the present invention is to provide adenoviral vaccine can prevent SARS epidemic "SARS", the better to prevent "SARS" the occurrence and spread; a further object of the present invention to provide a using as deficient adenoviral vector, by cloning, recombinant and other means, adenoviral vector disclosed SARS vaccine preparation and use of vaccines SARS-associated coronavirus S gene in the manufacture.

Object of the present invention is achieved: by means of biological engineering, the S gene of SARS-associated coronavirus (CoV total of four structural gene, wherein one of the S gene, see detailed description below) in combination with deficient recombinant adenovirus, constitute a gene vaccine can cause mucosal immunogenicity. ==

Chinese Patent genetic engineering protein FSPA relevant to S protein of coronavirus SARS- CoV (2005)

http://europepmc.org/article/pat/CN1990502

Coronal virus genetic engineering protein and use thereof

XU JINPING MENG

Patent: Unexamined APPLIC. open to Public inspection - China

Application: CN20051120530 on 27 Dec 2005

Publication: 27 Dec 2005

PAT: CN1990502

Patent

Abstract

The invention discloses a genetic engineering protein of coronavirus and its application. That is genetic engineering protein FSPA relevant to S protein of coronavirus SARS- CoV and nucleotide sequences amnio sequence and code said FSPA. The invention also discloses a recombinant insect virus strain containing SARS- CoV Spike- recombinant autographa californica nucleopolyhe-drovirus AcNPV- FSPA, CCTCC No.V200513, inserts into the expression box of SARS- CoV Spike. The inventiton also discloses the application of FSPA in checking the coronavirus SARS- CoV, which is the pathogen for acute respiratory syndrome.

(6) John Hopkins University conducted pandemic simulations in 2001, 2005, 2018 & 2019

John Hopkins pandemic simulations 2001 (Dark Winter), 2005 (Atlantic Storm), May 15 2018 (Clade X), Oct 18 2019 (Event 201)

https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/06/event-201-health-security/

Pandemic simulation exercise spotlights massive preparedness gap

Event 201, hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, envisions a fast-spreading coronavirus with a devastating impact

By Katie Pearce / Published Nov 6, 2019

Back in 2001, it was a smallpox outbreak, set off by terrorists in U.S. shopping malls. This fall, it was a SARS-like virus, germinating quietly among pig farms in Brazil before spreading to every country in the world.

With each fictional pandemic Johns Hopkins experts have designed, the takeaway lesson is the same: We are nowhere near prepared.

"Once you're in the midst of a severe pandemic, your options are very limited," says Eric Toner, a senior scholar at the Center for Health Security at Johns Hopkins University. "The greatest good can happen with pre-planning."

"ONCE YOU'RE IN THE MIDST OF A SEVERE PANDEMIC, YOUR OPTIONS ARE VERY LIMITED. THE GREATEST GOOD CAN HAPPEN WITH PRE-PLANNING."

Eric Toner Senior scholar, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security

That center's latest pandemic simulation, Event 201, dropped participants right in the midst of an uncontrolled coronavirus outbreak that was spreading like wildfire out of South America to wreak worldwide havoc. As fictional newscasters from "GNN" narrated, the immune-resistant virus (nicknamed CAPS) was crippling trade and travel, sending the global economy into freefall. Social media was rampant with rumors and misinformation, governments were collapsing, and citizens were revolting.

For those participating in New York City on Oct. 18‹a heavyweight group of policymakers, business leaders, and health officials‹Event 201 was a chance to see how much catch-up work is needed to bolster our disaster response systems. Full videos of the discussion are available online.

"It really does shake up assumptions and change thinking about how we can prepare for a global pandemic," says Tom Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security.

Event 201 is the fourth such exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins center, which works to prepare communities for biological threats, pandemics, and other disasters. The simulations started with 2001's Dark Winter, which gathered national security experts for its simulated smallpox outbreak. The groundbreaking event turned out to be influential in shaping U.S. efforts around pandemic preparedness‹particularly due to its timing, right before 9/11.

"Dark Winter resulted in more than a dozen congressional hearings, was briefed to the White House, and ultimately influenced the decision to stockpile enough smallpox vaccine for all Americans," Inglesby says.

That simulation and its two successors‹Atlantic Storm, conducted in 2005, and last summer's Clade X‹have also demonstrated lasting value as educational and advocacy tools, with reenactments or modified versions taking place in settings including universities, the CDC, and Capitol Hill, according to Inglesby. "These exercises have a long fuse," he says.

For Event 201, hosted in collaboration with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the experts added a new layer of realism by reaching beyond government and NGOs to leaders in the private sector and business community. Participants included representatives from NBCUniversal, UPS, and Johnson & Johnson.

"Very few people have included the private sector in pandemic preparedness, but that's where most of the resources are," Toner says.

That's particularly true when it comes to vaccine development. The CAPS virus‹which Toner describes as a cousin of SARS, "but slightly more transmissible, like the flu, and slightly more lethal"‹was presented as resistant to any existing vaccine, as scientists scrambled to come up with one. Citizens, meanwhile, were rioting over scarce access to the next best thing: a fictional antiviral known to treat some CAPS symptoms.

That scenario, Toner says, is utterly realistic. "We don't have a vaccine for SARS, or MERS, or various avian flu viruses that have come up in the past decade," he notes. "That's because vaccine development is slow and difficult if there isn't an immediate market for it."

In the simulation, CAPS resulted in a death toll of 65 million people within 18 months‹surpassing the deadliest pandemic in history, the 1918 Spanish flu.

From the discussions Event 201 inspired, the Center for Health Security plans to release a set of formal recommendations within the coming weeks.

Shortly after the simulation, the center released the Global Health Security Index, the first-ever comprehensive ranking of countries on their pandemic preparedness. All in all, the picture was discouraging: The average score, across 195 countries, was 40 out of a possible 100.

"It's our hope," Inglesby says, "that countries will use this to consider where they are strong and where they are weak." ==

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events/2018_clade_x_exercise/index.html

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted the Clade X pandemic tabletop exercise on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC. The purpose of the exercise was to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail.

(7) Ralph Baric was a Speaker at WIV in 2018 (8th International Symposium on Emerging Viral Diseases)

http://english.whiov.cas.cn/Exchange2016/International_Conferences2017/201811/t20181116_201325.html

The 8th International Symposium on Emerging Viral Diseases was held in Wuhan

Date 16-11-2018

The 8th International Symposium on Emerging Viral Diseases was held in Wuhan from October 20th to 22nd. The conference was hosted by Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and jointly organized by State Key Laboratory of Virology, WIV, CAS, Hubei & Wuhan Society for Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, CAS, Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, WIV, CAS and Virologica Sinica. More than 300 people from 12 countries including China, the United States, France, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Estonia, Kenya and Pakistan attended the symposium.

At the opening ceremony, WANG Yanyi, the Deputy Director General of WIV, CAS, delivered a speech on behalf of the organizers and expressed warm welcome to the experts and representatives attending the symposium. She pointed out that the frontier basic research and applied research of emerging infectious diseases, pathogenic mechanism, prevention and control technology are the key research areas of our institute. This Symposium has become a branded international academic activity sponsored by WIV, which is committed to playing an active role in the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases in the world, and strives to promote international exchanges and cooperation in this research.

The symposium presented the latest achievements in the field of emerging viral diseases research, including keynote speeches, oral reports, and poster presentations. The symposium was set up with four themes of "Emerging Viral Pathogens", "Viral-host Interaction", "Antiviral Immunity" and "Arbovirus". A total of 34 reporters from 10 countries gave wonderful reports on the SARS coronavirus, MERS coronavirus, influenza virus, Ebola virus, Nipah virus, Zika virus and other important emerging viruses. Prof. WANG Linfa from Duke-NUS Medical School, Prof. Ralph Baric from University of North Carolina, Dr.Peter Daszak from Ecohealth Alliance, Prof. SHI Peiyong from University of Texas Medical Branch, USA, and Prof. JAING Shibo from Fudan University make plenary lectures respectively. At the same time, the meeting specially set up the poster comparison. According to the voting results of the participants, six posters with the highest number of votes were selected and awarded.

So far, the Symposiums have been successfully held for eight sessions, and an open, high-quality academic exchange platform has been established for experts and scholars engaged in emerging virus research at home and abroad. The influence of the symposium has been increasing, and the number of participants has grown year by year. It has played a positive role in promoting the development of virology research and has been well received by delegates.

(8) One Health Platform features Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance & Nick Juleff of Gates Foundation

Look up "One Health" and "One Health Platform". These are major projects involving WHO and elite 'Philanthropists', as a form of World 'Governance'.

This material was posted to Twitter by defeattheelites.

https://twitter.com/WeAre_TheElite/status/1250572701531607042

mirror at https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1250572689905004549.html

1.) Shi Zhengli, the Dir of the Wuhan BSL4 Lab & her Coronavirus team who has collaborated for years, was funded in part by Dr. Fauci's NIAID and the research was a result of a "One Health. One Medicine" Initiative of Gates & Soros.

2.) Shi "Bat Lady" Zhengli has been swirling around the net recently, as some believe her Wuhan Institute of Virology BSL4 Lab was where COVID-19 originated. Though she now denies the virus leaked, Zhengli initially thought it may have come from her Lab.

3.) While patient zero has yet to be identified, the theory that the virus was manufactured in the Wuhan Lab cannot be dismissed, especially considering Shi Zhengli was on a team w/ Dr. Ralph Baric in 2015, who had literally MANUFACTURED a Coronavirus capable of human emergence.

4.) It's worth noting that the research that lead to Baric & Zhengli's team manufacturing a new Coronavirus in 2015, was in part, funded by Dr. Fauci's NIAID.

5.) Baric has received tens of millions of dollars from NIAID & others over the years for his research on Sars/Coronavirus & Vaccine development. This month he even received a 125 million dollar grant to develop a new vaccine to prevent future pandemics.

6.) As a partner of Shi Zhengli, Ralph Baric is no stranger to Wuhan. In 2018 he was a Speaker at Zhengli's Wuhan Institute of Virology for their 8th International Symposium on Emerging Viral Diseases, held in Wuhan, China. Other attendees were Peter Daszak & Linfa Wang.

7.) Peter Daszak, Linfa Wang, Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli have been collaborating for years on Coronavirus projects. Another partner was George F Gao, whose name you can see in the pic. Gao was a player in Event 201 and was behind the start of the Wuhan BSL4 Lab.

8.) I go a little more into detail with George Gao on the below thread, which also goes over some of the peculiar pandemic events happening right before the wuhan virus.

9.) A couple of interesting facts. Shi Zhengli is known as Bat Woman and her partner Linfa Wang is nicknamed Batman. According to an article by the WHO, the 2011 movie Contagion was entirely based on Linfa Wang & his team. {Linfa Wang may be a 'partner' in research, but he is not the husband of Shi Zhengli; his wife is Meng Yu - Peter M.}

10.) Imagine that, you've spent ur career studying bats & pandemic preparedness, they call u "Bat Man", a hollywood movie was made over your real life story, & then years later, a bat virus breaks out a mere miles away from the Virology lab, where you're a committee director at!

11.) Wang has been on a number of WHO advisory committees, including the Sars Research Adv Committee & multiple Covid-19 committees.

12.) Along with Linfa Wang on the SARS ADV Committee, is Dr. Ian Lipkin, who also has ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Also like Wang, Ian Lipkin played a role in the 2011 Contagion Film. He was actually sought out by the film director for his expertise.

13) Imagine spending ur career on viruses/pandemics, they call u Virus Hunter, Hollywood directors come to u for their pandemic movies, then years later a virus starts a few miles from the Institute you've partnered with, leading to a pandemic & YOU GET INFECTED BY THAT VIRUS!!

14.) Not only does Lipkin work with the WHO, but he has deep ties to China. In 2016 he received China's "Top Science Honor" at a ceremony presided by Xi Jinping. The award recognized Lipkin for his contribution & promotion to the scientific advancement in China.

16.) This Coronavirus collaboration between Zhengli, Wang, Lipkin, George Gao, & Baric, appears to be lead by WHO advisor Peter Daszak, Pres of EcoHealth Alliance, funded heavily by Fauci's NIAID & evolved from an initiative of Bill Gates & George Soros.

17.) Peter Daszak who has led Shi Zhengli's coronavirus research, is president of EcoHealth Alliance. According to his bio he is also on the Supervisory Board of the One Health Platform & on the One Health Commission council of Advisors.

18.) This One Health Platform that Daszak is involved with has a few names you may recognize on their Scientific Advisory Board. Linfa Wang , George Gao, & Nick Juleff of the Gates Foundation. On the One Health Editorial Board is Ian Lipkin, Daszak, & Wang.

19) The One Health Platform comes from an Initiative called "One Health". A paper in 2015, discusses Zoonotic outbreaks like Coronavirus, & talks about the "One Health" Initiative, who the Gates Foundation are advocates for, along with WHO, CDC, & the World Bank.

20.) "One Health" is derived from "One", which was a concept by Bill Gates & Bono. They along with Bobby Shriver, George Soros, Bob Geldoff & others, formed "ONE", with "major backing from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation".

21) So to put this into perspective, Peter Daszak, the man behind Shi Zhengli's work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, is on the Supervisory Board and the Council of Advisors for the "One Health Platform", which comes from an initiative of Gates & Soros among other globalists.

22) Peter Daszak led a project called PREDICT, as part of the Emerging Pandemic Threats program, "to develop an evidence base to demonstrate the value of the One Health approach" Which we now know is a Gates & Soros initiative. Zhengli & Lipkin's research was for PREDICT.

23) An interesting connection can be found between Zhengli, Linfa Wang, & George Gao, who've all been involved w/ Wuhan BSL4 Lab. They are all on the Editorial Board for Virologica Sinica along w/Xiangguo Qiu.

24.) In July 2019 Xiangguo Qiu, her husband, & her students from China were expelled from Canada's only BSL4 lab. Qiu was going to Wuhan National Biosafety Lab of the Chinese Academy of Sciences twice a year for 2 years for up to 2 weeks at a time.

25.) Peter Daszak is also friends with Dr. Fauci. Fauci was a keynote Speaker at the Ermerging & Re-Emerging Viruses conference where Peter Daszak, George Gao, Linfa Wang, and Shi Zhengli were all speakers at.

26.) Peter Daszak also starred alongside Bill Gates in a documentary called "The Next Pandemic", which was released one month before the Wuhan Virus supposedly began.

27.) Daszak was also one of the very first people to publicly mention the Wuhan Virus. Soon after the Wuhan Health authorities discussed patients with Pneumonia, there was Daszak on the frontlines pushing the butchered mammal meat theory & suspecting Coronavirus.

28.) In the same thread, & before the cases of pneumonia were found to be due to coronavirus, he talks about his Coronavirus expeditions with Zhengli Shi, Linfa Wang, & of being recently re-funded by Fauci's NIAID.

29) He ends talking of his collaboration with China CDC, Wuhan Inst of Virology & Baric Lab & says "There is the beginnings of a global mechanism to do this", working with NIAID (Fauci), CEPI vaccines (Gates Funded), & WellcomeTrust".

30.) I just can't help but think of how surreal this must be for Peter Daszak. He is part of a company that supports Soros & Gates' One Health, One Medicine agenda. With goals of Universal Healthcare for all & Universal Vaccines. He is asked to lead the PREDICT team where he....

31.) ...discovers Bats are the original reservoirs for Coronavirus, he is partners with scientists who manufactured a coronavirus (Zhengli, Baric), the movie Contagion is made with the guidance of one of his partners (Lipkin), and based on true events of another partner (Wang),

32) his team makes the 1st discovery certain Coronaviruses can infect human cells, he even worked with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where just a few miles away, exactly what Daszak & his team have been working on & preparing for...takes place...a Zoonotic Pandemic in China.

33.) And as a result of that pandemic (COVID-19), the "One Health. One Medicine" agenda that Daszak is involved with, (a Soros and Gates Initiative), may get them one step closer to their hopes for global governance, surveillance, & a universal vaccine.

34.) This all ties well w/a recent thread of mine. Where Fauci, Gates, and co are all pushing the development of a Universal Vaccine with plans to have them available to EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE. Let's just hope its voluntary.

35.) In 2019, the Gates Foundation helped fund a tabletop exercise called Event 201. In 2018, the exercise was called Clade X. The scenario was a global pandemic outbreak leading to quarantines, stock market crash, school closures and many of the things happening today.

36) In the final scenario, the healthcare system crashed, leading to Nationalized (Govt Controlled) Healthcare, vaccines were distributed globally & it was discovered once atleast 80% of the population was vaccinated, the epidemic would be under control.

END

Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.

Write to me at contact.html.

HOME