The connection between Israel's Nukes & the 3rd Temple: it's the reason Israel assassinated JFK
by Peter Gerard Myers
Date: April 19, 2025; update April 23, 2025.
My comments are shown {thus}; write to me at contact.html.
You are at http://mailstar.net/JFKMossad.html
Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.
SUMMARY: The connection between James Jesus Angleton (head of CounterIntelligence, and CIA liason with Israel) and Mossad indicates that Mossad killed JFK, at the behest of David ben-Gurion and with Angleton handling the CIA's role in the operation, because JFK was trying to halt the development of nuclear weapons at Dimona. Israel wanted nuclear weapons because it intended to remove Al Aqsa mosque and the Dome of the Rock, and build the Third Temple on the site. Only nuclear weapons could stop Arab/Islamic retaliation. Angleton, a fanatical Zionist, operated as a Mossad mole within the CIA; he ran a covert program to supply Israel with nuclear materials behind President Kennedy's back. The outcome of the assassination of JFK suited Israel's goals rather than the CIA's goals. That is, LBJ made US foreign policy subservient to Israel, but Castro was not blamed and Cuba was not attacked. This shows that the CIA plot was not the primary one. Rather, the CIA, and Meyer Lansky gangsters such as Jack Ruby, were used by Mossad as accomplices and agents. Freemasonry was also involved, but in a subordinate role in the service of Zionism.
The connection between Israel's Nukes & the 3rd Temple: it's the reason Israel assassinated JFK. The CIA, (Meyer Lansky) Mafia and Freemasons were mere accomplices and agents
(1) Read this A4 poster - it sums up the evidence
(2) Gaddafi's speech to the UN General Assembly on why JFK was killed
(3) JFK files raise Angleton-Israel connection - Laurent Guyénot
(4) Thoughts on Laurent Guyénot's Argument
(5) Events On October 7 And 9/11 Were Scripted, Like In A Movie
(6) Alan Sabrosky endorses the Player/Script model
(7) Michael A. Hoffman II on the role of Freemasons in the JFK Cover-up
(8) The connection between Israel's Nukes and the Third Temple
(1) Read this A4 poster - it sums up the evidence
Thanks to Laurent Guyenot for providing the correct link.
https://x.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1911514838540353778
THE ISRAELI TRAIL - THE ROAD LESS TRAVELLED IN JFK ASSASSINATION RESEARCH
by Laurent Guyenot ==
I uploaded a .jpg version of the A4 poster to JFKMossadPosterLG.jpg .This one is better for printing; it prints a single A4 sheet.
(2) Gaddafi's speech to the UN General Assembly on why JFK was killed
https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1902695439528300833
Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinklle
Gaddafi once said that ISRAEL killed JFK!
{video shows Gaddafi addressing UNGA; the English translation is below}
The UN General Assembly should start an investigation into the assassination of US President Kennedy. We know that he was killed by one Lee Harvey. Then came one Jack Ruby, and killed Lee Harvey, Kennedy's killer. Why did he kill him? Jack Ruby was an Israeli who killed Lee Harvey, Kennedy's killer. Why would this Israeli kill Kennedy's killer? Then Jack Ruby, the killer of Kennedy's killer, died in mysterious circumstances before his retrial. Why? Open the files. What I know, and what we were taught in history class, is that Kennedy had decided to hold an inspection of the Israeli Dimona nuclear plant to find out whether there were nuclear bombs there. This is why they got rid of him.
10:15 PM · Mar 20, 2025
(3) JFK files raise Angleton-Israel connection - Laurent Guyénot
https://www.unz.com/article/whats-new-on-the-kennedy-assassination/
WhatÕs New on the Kennedy Assassination? Focus on the Angleton-Israel connection
Laurent Guyénot
April 15, 2025
To my knowledge, no earth-shattering revelations or damning evidence has emerged from the 64,000 documents made public since March 18th on the assassination of John Kennedy. Nevertheless, the theory of Israeli guilt is reinforced by clarifications on James Jesus Angleton's proximity to the Mossad. And the word is spreading on the social networks.
https://twitter.com/Gentilenewsnet/status/1902185732849996285> As shown here, the word Israel, which was blacked out from a previously declassified document, is now cleared on the new version. This indicates that, while the CIA had wanted to conceal the link between Angleton and Israel, the link is now so well known that the redaction of the word Israel has become ridiculously counterproductive. Similarly, on another document mentioning that Angleton "run several intelligence projects, many of them with [the Israeli Intelligence Service]", the words in brackets have also been un-redacted, as pointed out on the https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1902344051766260192> Wikileaks X account, followed by 5.8 million subscribers.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc1888cbe-3bab-462c-be88-89b7132ca06d_900x560.jpeg>
A newly declassified page https://twitter.com/KAGdrogo/status/1902931406499811797> shown here cites CIA director (DCI) John McCone about the secret diplomatic crisis between the White House and the Jewish state over the latter's determination to build nuclear bombs. Noting that the Israelis are "withholding information on the extent of its nuclear activities", and "refuse to submit to international safeguards prescribed by the International Atomic Energy Agency", McCone feared that the Israeli project would "trigger grave trouble in the Middle East", and recommended to President Kennedy, as he had to his predecessor Eisenhower (as chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission), to impose economic sanctions against Israel. It must be remembered that McCone had been placed at the head of the CIA by Kennedy precisely because of his good knowledge of and opposition to the Israeli Dimona project.
This reminds us that incriminating "the CIA" in general terms for the Kennedy assassination makes little sense, since its director was certainly innocent. What needs to be done is to identify the CIA agents who may have been involved without their director's knowledge. The name on which all suspicions focus since the 1970s is that of James Jesus Angleton, head of Counterintelligence. The CIA trail leads straight to the threshold of his office. However, since the publication in 2017 of his biography by Jefferson Morley ( https://www.amazon.com/Ghost-Secret-Spymaster-James-Angleton/dp/1250167302/ref=sr_1_1> The Ghost), we know that his office led to the Mossad through a back door. Thus, through Angleton, the trail of the CIA leads straight to the Mossad, just like through Jack Ruby (Jacob Rubenstein), the trail of the "mafia" leads straight to the Irgun. Sam Parker https://twitter.com/BasedSamParker/status/1902461124970475683> summarizes well here the main acts of treason of Angleton in favor of Israel.
As stated in a Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1987/12/05/the-secret-ceremony/d8d30dab-fe95-4ba0-b52f-c50a04795b77/> article ( https://twitter.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1904201038401360206> read here) on the tributes paid to Angleton in Israel after his death, "Angleton is reputed to have helped Israel obtain nuclear technical data". This is an understatement: Angleton in fact covered up the theft and smuggling of materials intended for the Dimona nuclear reactor. Angleton was thus sabotaging Kennedy's policy in a highly sensitive national and even global security matter.
Jefferson Morley, who has documented Angleton's intimate connection to Mossad chiefs but refrained from making the connection with the Kennedy assassination - and, in the 1990s, had dismissed Michael Piper - now ventures to mention Israel's possible involvement in the assassination in this interview with Tucker Carlson:
Tucker Carlson talks to Jefferson Morley about lsraeI's involvement in the assassination of JFK.
So close to "crossing that line!" In fact, Tucker is basically ON the line, and leaning over as far as he can, without actually "crossing it"
~George https://t.co/bhzzAiFJeb> pic.twitter.com/bhzzAiFJeb
- Amber Lynn (@amber_tx) https://twitter.com/amber_tx/status/1884858081294643486?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> January 30, 2025
At another occasion, Morley is heard explaining that Angleton had close relations with the Mossad and was hiding from the Church Committee (1975) his knowledge of how the CIA had helped Israel to steal nuclear materials from the U.S. He also explains that, according to his own testimony before the Church Committee, Angleton had recruited Israelis whose profile matches that of Rubin Efron (Efron was an Israeli spy, and a document https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-jfk-documents-reveal-assassins-cia-monitor-was-jewish-spy-reuben-efron/> declassified in 2023 revealed that he had been tasked with spying on Oswald's mail for the CIA). But after emphasizing these important points, Morley summarizes what he can "say with confidence" ("my bottom line"): "The CIA's counterintelligence is responsible for the Kennedy assassination."
Jeff Morley is walking on thin ice, successfully. Re Angleton's closed-door testimony to Church committee in 1975, he brings evidence linking the JFK assassination to Israel, through Angleton, only to conclude "CIA's CounterIntelligence was responsible for Kennedy assassination". https://t.co/RqeIx1Eqgf> pic.twitter.com/RqeIx1Eqgf
- Laurent Guyénot (@Laurent_Guyenot) https://twitter.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1909168782129451398?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> April 7, 2025
Given that the head of counter-intelligence was also the exclusive liaison with Mossad, and that he had introduced Israeli spies into the CIA, including to spy on Oswald, and given that it was Morley who documented all of this, his conclusion sounds either like hypocrisy or like a ruse, an implicit way of saying that Israel is involved. I'd like to be optimist and belief the second hypothesis, but it is remarkable that Morley carefully avoids mention of Israel in his https://jfkfacts.substack.com/> JFK Facts Substack blog. Likewise, when Karl Golovin asked him to comment on the question of Israel's involvement in the Kennedy assassination, he replied: "I see no evidence of this." Interestingly, Oliver Stone shows his awareness of the Dimona and the AIPAC issues, but turns to Jim DiEugenio as the expert. As https://www.unz.com/article/jfk-and-americas-destiny-betrayed/> I showed here, DiEugenio has done a great job on https://www.kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-posthumous-assassination-of-john-f-kennedy> his website to show that LBJ reversed JFK's foreign policy, especially in the Middle East, but refrains from pointing out that this makes Israel a major suspect.
Great questions by Karl Golovin to Stone, Morley & DiEugenio, after recent House Hearing. 1. Oliver Stone (holding my book handed to him by Karl) is well aware the Dimona and the AIPAC issues, but, as usual, turns to DiEugenio as the "expert". https://t.co/lzMDor4mph> pic.twitter.com/lzMDor4mph
- Laurent Guyénot (@Laurent_Guyenot) https://twitter.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1908950780402397257?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> April 6, 2025
https://www.amazon.com/dp/2957170418/>
This brief question and answer session followed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8n_wr66bm8> a speech by Oliver Stone at the invitation of Anna Paulina Luna, appointed in February to head the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which is responsible for declassification. Anecdotally, Karl Golovin, sitting two rows behind Stone, https://twitter.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1908236142509764774> kept my book in view of the camera during the conference.
Karl also joined a recent https://jfkfacts.substack.com/> JFK Facts Zoom with Morley and DiEugenio, and it is pleasing to see both responding politely to his question. Morley dismisses as https://mosaicmagazine.com/observation/israel-zionism/2019/05/the-real-meaning-of-hasbarah-and-hasbarah/> "hasbarah" the fact that the Jewish press has called LBJ "the first Jewish US president", implying that this should not be taken seriously. Nevertheless, Morley allowing his "old friend" Karl Golovin to make his points, and answering him, is a welcome development. Jim DiEugenio's willingness to engage with the issue is also positive, although, like Morley, what he is saying essentially is that he does not see the evidence linking the JFK assassination to Israel.
Well done, Karl. Now that the Israel theory has been allowed into the debate, rather than simply ignored, it will inevitably win the debate in the end. Stressing what changed between JFK and LBJ is the key. Jim himself has written that the biggest change was in the Middle East. https://t.co/bNOaXkXVwL> pic.twitter.com/bNOaXkXVwL
- Laurent Guyénot (@Laurent_Guyenot) https://twitter.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1911514832794505317?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> April 13, 2025
Whatever are the motivations of Jim DiEugenio and Jefferson Morley for dismissing the Israel theory, they must be commended for their work: DiEugenio for showing how LBJ reversed JFK's foreign policy in favor of Israel, and Morley for showing that the main suspect within the CIA was more loyal to the Mossad than to his own hierarchy. As an example, Morley mentions in his book The Ghost, p. 171, that, from the mid-50s, "Angleton liked nothing better than to leave the cramped office politics of Washington for the austere frontier of the Holy Land. On his visits, Angleton stayed in Ramat Gan, on the suburban coastal plain north of Tel Aviv, the home to many Israeli intelligence officers and diplomats."
"He used to come from time to time, to meet the head of Mossad, to get briefings," recalls Efraim Halevy, who served as the Mossad's liaison officer to the CIA station in Tel Aviv in the early 1960s. Halevy escorted Angleton on his rounds and recorded his meetings with Israeli officials. "He used to meet with David Ben-Gurion, whom he knew for many years," Halevy recalled. "Ben-Gurion ultimately left office [in 1963] and Angleton went down to Sde Boker [Ben-Gurion's home in the Negev] to meet him. I didn't attend those meetings. Those were just the two of them. He had business to transact."
What could Angleton and Ben-Gurion have been discussing secretly that day? Remember that Ben-Gurion resigned (officially "for personal reasons") on the day (June 16, 1963) he was to receive Kennedy's final letter threatening Israel with sanctions if Israel refused an inspection of Dimona. The most reasonable hypothesis is that, having failed to make Kennedy yield on that matter, Ben Gurion decided to deal with him in another method ( https://www.amazon.com/Rise-Kill-First-Targeted-Assassinations/dp/0812982118/> the rise-and-kill-first method). He probably called on the Irgun and Lehi veterans, specialists in political assassinations and false-flag operations, in particular Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, who would later be prime ministers.
Angleton has no doubt become, thanks to Morley's work, a key piece of the puzzle. And although Morley struggles to keep the two Angletons separate (the CIA Angleton and the Mossad Angleton), Angleton has now been exposed as a traitor to his own country for bringing Israeli spies into the CIA, including into the monitoring of Oswald. This is of equal significance to LBJ being exposed as a traitor to his own country by allowing Israel to try to sink the USS Liberty and get away with it.
As Karl Golovin reminds us, Angleton was deeply admirative of the Mossad:
Angleton seems dismissive of CIA or "intelligence" of any democracy having "great merit," yet relishes the idea that a small country's service, with "singleness of purpose" (Israel/ Mossad?) and "one great penetration" (recruit Angleton? get nuclear bomb?) can "move the world."É https://t.co/yFT7TpVHSS> pic.twitter.com/yFT7TpVHSS
- Karl Golovin (@KarlGolovin) https://twitter.com/KarlGolovin/status/1911586604193394942?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> April 14, 2025
In conclusion, great progress has been made over the last decade in the investigation into the assassination of JFK. The Israeli connection, first suggested by Michael Collins Piper in the 1990s, is now being raised by influential figures such as the historian Martin Sandler, who in 2013 edited a https://www.amazon.com/Letters-John-F-Kennedy/dp/1608192717/> collection of Kennedy's letters, including his exchange with Ben-Gurion in June 1963. It is fair to clarify that in the post below, the beginning of his sentence has been cut off, so that he seems to affirm a conviction, when in fact he is only summarizing Piper's theory, without explicitly validating it. Nevertheless, his taking seriously this thesis is significant.
"Mossad kiIIed Kennedy."
- Martin W. Sandler, American historian
https://t.co/2kGCKVZqnA> pic.twitter.com/2kGCKVZqnA
- ADAM (@AdameMedia) https://twitter.com/AdameMedia/status/1896736898737115520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> March 4, 2025
Since Johnson has been openly recognized as the most pro-Israel US president since Truman, investigators who targeted Lyndon Johnson as the mastermind of the assassination can no longer ignore Israel's involvement. An example with Roger Stone, author of https://www.amazon.com/Man-Who-Killed-Kennedy-Against/dp/1629144894/> The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ:
Kennedy was also in conflict with the State of Israel.
Israel sought to develop nuclear weapons, but Kennedy opposed the idea.
After JFK's assassination, President Lyndon Baines Johnson approved Israel's pursuit of the nuclear bomb.
Another factor in all of this. https://t.co/82ISNOqGuQ> pic.twitter.com/82ISNOqGuQ
- Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) https://twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/1901997024330887194?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw> March 18, 2025
With Israel's genocide in Gaza, the cognitive inhibitions that prevented considering Israel's guilt in the assassination of Kennedy are crumbling. Highly influential journalists such as Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson have broken the taboo. Jackson Hinkle, followed by almost 3 million subscribers on X, relays https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1902695439528300833> Muammar Gaddafi's speech at the UN General Assembly, which was almost impossible to find on the internet even a year ago.
I am happy to have contributed to this development with my book and my film, which Ron Unz quotes favorably in his recent article https://www.unz.com/runz/how-israel-killed-the-kennedys/> "How Israel killed the Kennedys":
One of the tiny handful of later writers willing to embrace and promote the Piper Hypothesis has been Laurent Guyénot, a leading French conspiracy-researcher. Although I might not necessarily endorse every particular element, I would strongly recommend his 2019 book https://www.amazon.com/dp/2957170418/> The Unspoken Kennedy Truth as the best single exposition of the Israel/Mossad case for the JFK Assassination. This paperback summarizes all the important information and is short enough that it can easily be read in just a day or two. His 2018 article on the same subject covers the same information in much more abbreviated form: " https://www.unz.com/article/did-israel-kill-the-kennedies/> Did Israel Kill the Kennedys?" (June 3, 2018). Guyénot also presented this same controversial material in the form of a 2022 documentary available on YouTube. Although perhaps too hagiographic, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a37FM542MXE> "Israel and the Assassinations of the Kennedy Brothers" likewise constitutes the best video introduction to that subject.
The film can be watched on the Youtube channel of the indispensable Sam Parker:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a37FM542MXE> Video Link
Feel free to use https://twitter.com/Laurent_Guyenot/status/1911514838540353778/photo/1> my poster recapping the essential arguments of the case against Israel in the Kennedy assassinations (plural intended).
(Republished from https://radbodslament.substack.com/p/whats-new-on-the-kennedy-assassination> Substack by permission of author or representative)
(4) Thoughts on Laurent Guyénot's Argument
- by Peter Gerard Myers, April 21, 2025
I acknowledge Piper's evidence for Mossad involvement, in my book The Cosmopolitan Empire: One World but Whose? And I add a bit more:
QUOTE Victor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad agent, revealed that a faction within Mossad planned to assassinate President George H. Bush, for pushing the Madrid Peace Conference of 1991 onto Israel; the assasination would be blamed on Palestinians. Another Mossad officer, Ephraim Halevy, warned Ostrovsky of the plot, and asked him to publicise it, so as to head off the plotters.
A certain right-wing clique in the Mossad regarded the situation as a life-or-death crisis and decided to take matters into their own hands, to solve the problem once and for all. (Ostrovsky & Hoy, 1990, p. 278)
Ephraim called me on Tuesday, October 1. I could sense from the tone of his voice that he was extremely stressed. "They're out to kill Bush," he said. At first, I didn't understand what he was talking about. ...
"I mean really kill, as in assassinate."
"What are you talking about? You can't be serious. They would never dare do something like that."
"Don't go naive on me now," he said. "They're going to do it during the Madrid peace talks." (p. 281)
Ostrovsky did make a public statement about it, after which one of Bush's security team contacted him and obtained the details. This foiled the plot.
In 2012, Andrew Adler, owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, suggested that Mossad kill President Obama, in order to obtain a successor who would help Israel obliterate Iran. ...
The Jewish Lobby was quick to distance itself from Adler, but an article in Haaretz by Chemi Shalev argued that Adler's views did not arise in isolation; he was part of a network of extremist Jews and their supporters. Yitzhak Rabin was killed for a similar reason and by a similar ideologue.
The CIA and FBI investigated Adler, but took no action. He resigned from the newspaper, and the "mainstream" media let the story die. It would have been a different matter if Adler had been a Moslem. ...
The Mossad plot to kill Bush Snr., and Adler's proposed Mossad hit on Obama, aimed at installing the Vice-President in his place, show that David ben Gurion's purported endorsement of the assassination of JFK is not without parallel. Even so, major responsibility rests with the CIA and other components of the Deep State in the United States. (pp. 339-341)
ENDQUOTE From The Cosmopolitan Empire: One World but Whose? by Peter Gerard Myers
US$29 at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Cosmopolitan-Empire-One-World-Whose/dp/0645836117/
The Ostrovsky quote is from Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy, By Way of Deception, St Martin's Press, New York 1990; it's online at ostrovsky.html.
Guyénot shows that the assasination of JFK involved both Mosssad and the CIA, but that the CIA may have intended the assassination attempt to fail. In that version of the CIA plot, Castro would be framed as the planner behind it, after which Kennedy, having survived, would attack Cuba.
Israel, aware of that CIA plot, hijackied it and had JFK killed; in a similar way, on 9/11, Mossad hijacked an Al Qaeda plot that DID NOT involve flying planes into the towers.
The beauty of it is that by implicating multiple intelligence agencies, it's difficult for allied agencies to dob each other in.
The outcome of the assassination of JFK suited Israel's goals rather than the CIA's goals.
That is, LBJ made US foreign policy subservient to Israel, but Castro was not blamed and Cuba was not attacked.
This shows that the CIA plot was not the primary one. Rather, the CIA, and Meyer Lansky gangsters such as Jack Ruby, were used by Mossad as accomplices and agents.
(5) Events On October 7 And 9/11 Were Scripted, Like In A Movie
by Peter Gerard Myers, April 19, 2025
Many 9/11 Truthers are very informed and rational, but we know that no matter how strong our case, we cannot change the official narrative.
The narrative seems pitched at the 'general public', Joe Sixpack and Sally SoccerMom. They follow the script like they follow a Netflix movie. Any rational objections are brushed off.
I argue that the designers of the plot, both 9/11 and October 7, planned it like a movie script.
The following is from my book Holocaust Reparations and the Gaza Genocide:
QUOTE Events on October 7 and 9/11 were scripted, like in a movie. There were separate scripts for Arab roles and Mossad roles.
Victor Ostrovsky and Ari Ben-Menashe report cases where Mossad infiltrated Arab terrorist groups and got them to serve Israeli ends without knowing it.
I submit that the same happened on both 9/11 and October 7. The scenario I present is one where there are players and a script. The Arab players know only part of the script; the Mossad agents in their midst know the whole lot. But the number of conspirators, on both 9/11 and October 7, is very few; even Mossad has factions; not all agree, and only a few at the top are fully informed.
On October 7 (and the months before) the players are Hamas leaders (Sinwar), plus one or more Mossad agents in their midst. Sinwar envisaged invading and taking control of part of Israel adjacent to Gaza. It was a foolish idea because Israel is so strong militarily. But the Mossad agents must have encouraged it.
On October 7, IDF units in the southern (Gaza) zone were stood down for 7 hours. It was like the NORAD stand-down on 9/11. Also, some IDF units had been transferred from Gaza to the West Bank. And other IDF personnel were given holiday leave. Normally, IDF helicopters take only 5 minutes to reach the Gaza fence. But on Oct 7, helicopters had to come from Haifa, and tanks from the Egyptian border.
Then there was the Mass Hannibal. All of this was all part of the script. The idea was to let Hamas terrify Israelis so badly that they would commit a genocide afterwards, annihilating Gaza and cleansing the West Bank.
On 9/11 the players are: Al Qaeda hijackers, plus Mossad agents in their midst. The Al Qaeda hijackers know only part of the script. The Mossad agents in their midst know the whole lot.
The Al Qaeda hijackers probably thought they were going to take the planes to Cuba (or another airport) and demand prisoner release (or other demands). They did not intend to FLY the planes themselves; previous Arab hijackers had never FLOWN the planes they hijacked.
Mohamed Atta had an American girlfriend for 2 months in the year before 9/11; she was a stripper named Amanda Keller. Daniel Hopsicker tracked her down, interviewed her, produced a video, and wrote a book (2007) titled Welcome To Terrorland: Mohamed Atta & The 9/11 Cover-Up In Florida. Amanda revealed that Mohamad Atta, Marwan Al-Shehhi and others could fly Cessnas even before they took more Cessna lessons in Florida. They had pilot licenses, but had never flown jets. Cessnas travel at 120 knots; the Boeing 757s and 767s on 9/11 travelled at 500 knots.
The fact that Atta and Al-Shehhi were pilots does not mean they intended to FLY the planes on 9/11. Being a pilot would be helpful even if you just wanted to take over a plane and get the pilot to divert to another airport.
The best evidence that they did not intend to FLY the planes, is that Hani Hanjour kept failing his lessons; he was a hopeless pilot, yet flying AA77 into the Pentagon was the most difficult of all tasks that day. Anyway, AA77 did not hit the Pentagon; it was a missile or a Global Hawk or something similar that did so.
I think that Mossad cooked up the idea that the hijackers were there to FLY the planes; it was a story, just like a plot in a movie. The Al Queda hijackers were not aware of that part of the script. It makes no difference whether the hijackers were on the planes or not. You must envisage the whole thing as a movie. The public (the audience) picks up the idea that the hijackers were training to fly, so that they could fly the planes. Next thing, the planes are hijacked. The audience assumed that they were flown by the hijackers. Remember, when you are watching a movie, your rational mind is not analysing everything, you are just following the plot and connecting the bits together.
After the hijackers were on board (or not), the planes were flown as drones, by uninterruptible autopilot, into WTC towers 1 & 2, which were already wired for demolition, with detonators like the Hezbollah Pagers that Mossad blew up in Lebanon. Like those Pagers, each detonator contained a battery, and would have been able to receive radio signals. Mossad itself made the Lebanon Pagers. (pp. 74-6)
ENDQUOTE - from Holocaust Reparations and the Gaza Genocide: Does One Holocaust Justify Another? by Peter Gerard Myers
US$25 at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Reparations-Gaza-Genocide-Justify/dp/064583615X
(6) Alan Sabrosky endorses the Player/Script model
by Peter Gerard Myers, April 19, 2025
Alan Sabrosky and I did a Brave Talk (like Zoom) video call on Jan 3 this year (Jan 2 in US).
His computer was playing up, and the Brave Talk had no sound, so I rang him on my landline (as well). We were talking into our phones (for sound), and using the screens for video.
Soon afterwards, I emailed him, and he emailed back, in an email dated Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:37:01 -0600:
QUOTE Our talk clarified a couple of things for me as well, and I think you are on target with the :player/script" model ENDQUOTE
But a few days after that, he had a minor stroke, which made his (already poor) vision worse.
(7) Michael A. Hoffman II on the role of Freemasons in the JFK Cover-up
Peter Gerard Myers, April 23, 2025
Freemasons were involved in the assassination of JFK, and in the cover-up.
Michael A. Hoffman II wrote:
Masonic Symbolism in the Assassination of John F.Kennedy
By James Shelby Downard with Michael A. Hoffman II, 1998
https://www.revisionisthistory.org/kingkill33.html <https://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=74
QUOTE Mason Lyndon Johnson appointed Mason Earl Warren to investigate the death of Catholic Kennedy. Mason and member of the 33rd degree, Gerald R. Ford, was instrumental in suppressing what little evidence of a conspiratorial nature reached the commission. Responsible for supplying information to the commission was Mason and member of the 33rd degree, J. Edgar Hoover. Former CIA director and Mason Allen Dulles was responsible for most of his agency's data supplied to the panel. ENDQUOTE
(8) The connection between Israel's Nukes and the Third Temple
Peter Gerard Myers, April 23, 2025
Ari Ben-Menashe was the main source of Seymour Hersh's book The Samson Option.
Ben-Menashe exposes the connection between Dimona and the Third Temple in his book Profits of War: The Sensational Story of the World-Wide Arms Conspiracy (Allen & Unwin, Sydney 1992).
QUOTE
The father of Israel's nuclear program in the mid- 1950s was the then young Shimon Peres, who was director general of the Ministry of Defense under David Ben-Gurion, the state's first prime minister and defense minister. Peres believed that if Israel was to survive, it had to have a deterrent against the Arab countries, and the ultimate deterrent would be nuclear weapons. With this in mind, Peres flew to France in 1956 for a meeting with President Charles de Gaulle. His mission: to get a nuclear reactor for Israel.
De Gaulle, a good friend of Ben-Gurion's from their days in exile during World War II, quickly authorized the sale to Israel of a weapons-grade nuclear reactor with the technology for the development of a nuclear bomb.'
Israel's first nuclear reactor was set up on the Mediterranean coast in Nahal Sorek in the Yavne area. It was used for research with enriched uranium, which was imported from France. The idea was to see if a nuclear project could be handled with Israeli know-how - and the aid of Jewish scientists brought in from the U.S.
After the initial research yielded positive results, Minister Without Portfolio Yisrael Galili, a leftwing powerbroker who directed the intelligence and security services, took upon himself with Ben-Gurion's blessing the cabinet-level supervision of the program. After tasting success in Yavne, within six to eight months he pushed through another nuclear plant in the Negev Desert near Dimona, some 40 miles northeast of Beersheba.
In a memorable speech after the groundbreaking for the supersecret Dimona nuclear plant, the usually subdued Galili stood up in a Mapai Party meeting and, with his chest proudly pushed out, declared, "The third temple is being built!"
This astonished other cabinet members, who at the time did not know what he was talking about. Galili continued by saying that the revival of Israel as a moral leader of the world was at hand and dared any of Israel's neighbors to attack. (pp. 204-5)
ENDQUOTE vanunu.html
Yisrael Galili, Minister without Portfolio, was in charge of developing Dimona. After work began, he made a speech saying "The third temple is being built!"
Then, Ben-Menashe says, "Galili continued by saying that the revival of Israel as a moral leader of the world was at hand and dared any of Israel's neighbors to attack."
"moral leader of the world" is a reference to the Messiah laying down the law to a united world, i.e. where nation-states have been replaced by a World State. The Third Temple has been built.
"dared any of Israel's neighbors to attack" is a reference to the destruction of Al Aqsa mosque, preliminary to building the Third Temple on the site.
That shows the connection between Dimona and the Third Temple. He's saying that Israel's nukes will stop Arab/Islamic retaliation for destroying Al Aqsa.
During the 1973 war, when Israel appeared to be losing, Moshe Dayan said that the Third Temple was at risk. Dayan wanted to launch a nuclear attack on Damascus and other sites.
But the word 'temple" was also a code-word for Israel's nukes.
Israeli writers let that pass without comment; but it's worth exploring the meaning.
If Israel were a secular state like Italy, and Zionism a mere nationalist movement like the unification of Italy, the 'temple' = 'nukes' codeword would not make sense. But if Zionism was, all along, a religious project, and the Third Temple always a key part of it, then the code makes sense, BUT the rest of the world has been deceived with the claim that it was a mere nationalist project.
The centrality of the Third Temple (and hence Nukes) to Zionism also explains why Israel was probably the main force behind the assassination of JFK; the CIA, (Meyer Lansky) Mafia and Freemasons being mere accomplices and agents.
Copyright Peter Gerard Myers. My insights do not come cheap; they are are the fruit of 30 years of study. If you use my ideas without crediting me, e.g. in an essay or a book, I will notice and I will publiicize it. But if you mention me, and link to mailstar.net/JFKMossad.html, I will be very happy for you to use my material. We are all working in the same cause; let's do the right thing by one another.
END
Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.
END
Write to me at contact.html.
