Nostradamus seems to predict the fall of Communism

by Peter Gerard Myers

Date: December 29, 2025; update Dec. 31, 2025.

My comments are shown {thus}; write to me at contact.html.

You are at http://mailstar.net/Nostradamus.html

Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.

Nostradamus predictions that seem to relate to the Soviet Union

Translation & comments in () [] by Rene Noorbergen, from his book Invitation to a Holocaust: Nostradamus Forecasts World War III (New English Library, London,1981).

Comments in {} by Peter Myers.

Note: Boristhenes was an old name for the Dnieper River, which runs through Ukraine. The Soviet Union broke up when Ukraine voted for independence.

1. ESTABLISHMENT OF SOVIET RUSSIA

De gent esclave, chansons, chants et requites,
Captifs par Princes et Seigneurs aux prisons:
A l'avenir par idiots sans tetes,
Seront recus par divines oraisons. (I, 14)

From the Slavish people [Russia] will come songs, slogans and threats
But then their Leaders and Statesmen placed in prisons,
The pronouncement of these headless idiots
Will be received as divine utterances.

2. FALL of SOVIET UNION

La loi Moricque on verra defaillir:
Apres une autre beaucoup plus seductive..
Boristhenes premier vien faillir:
Par dons et langue une plus attractive. (III,95)

The Law of Thomas More (communism) will decline,
Acceptance of another philosophy will be more appealing.
The River Dnieper {Ukraine} will give way first
Given goods by another nation more attractive.

{dons = consumer goods including blue jeans, Beatles music; langue = propaganda i.e. Radio Free Europe. West Ukraine did in fact initiate the breakup; Ukraine voted for independence}

Es lieux et temps chair au poisson donnera lieu,
La loi commune sera faite au contraire:
Vieux tiendra fort puis otee du milieu,
La Panta Chiona Philon mis fort arriere. (IV,32)

At the places and times when there is a religious abstinence [Easter],
The Communist law will be opposed
The old leaders will strongly support it but they will be removed from power,
'Loving of Everything in Common' - Communism - to suffer a significant setback.

Comment (Peter M).

On Dec. 12, 2025, I had a debate with Kevin Barrett about China, Taiwan and Japan. He supports China's right to invade Taiwan; I refute it. The debate starts at 25:56. https://truthjihad.com/2025/12/12/ffwn-greater-israel-or-greater-china-with-peter-myers/

During the debate, I mentioned a prediction by a medium, that turned out to be true.

The prediction was in book published in 1959 titled The Boy and the Brothers: A young untutored Londoner in the service of higher powers, by Swami Omananda Puri (Maud MacCarthy), published by Victor Gollancz, London. It contains predictions - from a medium - about Communism, Islam, China and Tibet.

"Watch the Middle East - the uprising of the Muslim power throughout the world - not Communism. Communism is NOT the present danger. It will die out. ... Do not worry over Tibet! Tibet will conquer China!" (p. 222)

The book is online at Boy_and_Brothers.pdf.

Note that the prediction about Communism was correct.

You may judge me gullible, but I see the above prediction about Tibet as a warning to China: if you invade Taiwan, it will set off a world war, which will spread to the Middle East. No doubt there would be much damage to western countries, lots of aircraft carriers sunk, maybe nuclear weapons. But the lesson for China is that China will break up. So, don't do it. I link this with a quatrain from Nostradamus:

La synagoge sterile sans nul fruit
Sera recue entre les infideles:
De Babylon la fille du poursuit,
Misere et triste lui tranchera les ailes. (VIII, 96)

The Synagogue sterile, having borne no fruit
Will be received into the hands of the Muslims:
The daughter of the persecuted exiles of Babylon
Will be miserable and sad because her wings of flight will be clipped.

Nostradamus was a Jew who converted to Catholicism. He lived centuries ago; how did he know that there would be a Jewish state?

The meaning, as I read it, is that if war breaks out between China and Taiwan/USA/Japan, it will spread to the Middle East and become a world war, during which Israel will be destroyed. So stop doing what you're doing; don't set it off; get a sense of reality - and humility.

The materialists will no longer be sceptics and materialists once this war breaks out. It will the end of atheism and nihilism. Atheism and nihilism are the deification of ourselves, the ultimate hubris.

NOTE: There are many interpretations of Nostradamus, and most of them are wrong.

I don't know how or why Nostradamus was able to see into the future, but the quatrains I quote above do seem to relate to the Soviet Union.

The main reason for your scepticism, reader, is that you have adopted the Materialist metaphysics that's the standard viewpoint in universities, the media etc.

You've never taken the trouble to PROVE that Materialist metaphysics.

Instead, like everyone else, you use Ockham's Razor to justify it. It's a simpler explanation of reality, right? Therefore it must be correct.

But, even the academics who tout Ockhams Razor cannot actually PROVE its validity as a Metaphysical Principle.

In fact, it's only a Rule of Thumb; and can't be used to prove anything. Probabilities yes, but Proof, no.

And before Ockhams Razor became widely used, they used to use the Principle of Verification as a sort of proof of the Materialist viewpoint.

Then, Kark Popper demolished it. So they used Ockhams Razor as a substitute.

Readers who would like to probe further should read The Science Delusion, by Rupert Sheldrake. He'a scientist himself. Start off with his TED talk: https://youtu.be/hO4p3xeTtUA

The debate about Rupert Sheldrake's talk

Posted by: TED Staff March 19, 2013 at 12:01 pm EDT

At TEDxWhitechapel on January 13, 2013, Rupert Sheldrake gave a provocative talk in which he suggests that modern science is based on ten dogmas, and makes the case that none of them hold up to scrutiny.

TRANSCRIPT:

The science delusion is the belief that science already understands the nature of reality in principle, leaving only the details to be filled in. This is a very widespread belief in our society. It's the kind of belief system of people who say "I don't believe in God, I believe in science." It's a belief system which has now been spread to the entire world.

But there's a conflict in the heart of science between science as a method of inquiry based on reason, evidence, hypothesis and collective investigation, and science as a belief system or a world view. And unfortunately the world view aspect of science has come to inhibit and constrict the free inquiry which is the very lifeblood of the scientific endeavor.

Since the late 19th century, science has been conducted under the aspect of a belief system or a world view which is essentially that of materialism Ñ philosophical materialism. And the sciences are now wholly owned subsidiaries of the materialist worldview. I think that as we break out of it, the sciences will be regenerated.

What I do in my book The Science Delusion, which is called Science Set Free in the United States, is take the ten dogmas, or assumptions of science, and turn them into questions. Seeing how well they stand up if you look at them scientifically. None of them stand up very well.

What I'm going to do is first run through what these ten dogmas are. And then I'll only have time to discuss one or two of them in a bit more detail.

But essentially the ten dogmas, which are the default worldview of most educated people all over the world are:

First, that nature's mechanical or machine-like. The universe is like a machine, animals and plants are like machines, we're like machines. In fact, we are machines. We are lumbering robots, in Richard Dawkins' vivid phrase. With brains that are genetically programmed computers.

Second, matter is unconscious. The whole universe is made up of unconscious matter. There's no consciousness in stars, in galaxies, in planets, in animals, in plants, and there ought not in any of us either, if this theory's true. So a lot of the philosophy of mind over the last 100 years has been trying to prove that we're not really conscious at all. So the matter's unconscious, then the laws of nature are fixed.

This is dogma three. The laws of nature are the same now as they were at the time of the Big Bang and they'll be the same forever. Not just the laws; but the constants of nature are fixed, which is why they are called constants.

Dogma four: The total amount of matter and energy is always the same. It never changes in total quantity, except at the moment of the Big Bang when it all sprang into existence from nowhere in a single instant.

The fifth dogma is that nature's purposeless. There are no purposes in all nature and the evolutionary process has no purpose or direction.

Dogma six, the biological hereditary is material. Everything you inherit is in your genes, or in epigenetic modifications of the genes, or in cytoplasmic inheritance. It's material.

Dogma seven, memories are stored inside your brain as material traces. Somehow everything you remember is in your brain in modified nerve endings, phosphorylated proteins, no one knows how it works. But nevertheless almost everyone in the scientific world believes it must be in the brain.

Dogma eight, your mind is inside your head. All your consciousness is the activity of your brain, and nothing more.

Dogma nine, which follows from dogma eight, psychic phenomena like telepathy are impossible. Your thoughts and intentions cannot have any effect at a distance because your mind's inside your head. Therefore all the apparent evidence for telepathy and other psychic phenomena is illusory. People believe these things happen, but it's just because they don't know enough about statistics, or they're deceived by coincidences, or it's wishful thinking.

And dogma ten, mechanistic medicine is the only kind that really works. That's why governments only fund research into mechanistic medicine and ignore complementary and alternative therapies.

Here is his book: https://argos.vu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/the-science-delusion-rupert-sheldrake.pdf

END

Sceptics ridicule religious people for debating "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin". But that's a straw-man argument, ascribing to them a position they did not take. No quotations from scholastic literature are cited to justify this ridicule.

Copyright: Peter Myers asserts the right to be identified as the author of the material written by him on this website, being material that is not otherwise attributed to another author.

END

Write to me at contact.html.